Geophysical constraints on the size and structure of the Chicxulub impact crater

被引:0
|
作者
Morgan, Joanna [1 ]
Warner, Mike [1 ]
Grieve, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom
[2] Earth Science Sector, NRCan, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A OE8, Canada
关键词
Technology transfer - Stratigraphy - Seismology;
D O I
10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.39
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clear images of impact craters on other planetary bodies reveal a progressive change in crater morphology with increasing crater size. Attempts to make direct comparisons between extraterrestrial and terrestrial craters have been hindered by the lack of pristine craters on Earth, particularly in the larger size range. This deficiency in ground truth data has also slowed our progress in understanding the cratering process for large impacts. However, the buried Chicxulub crater in Mexico now provides a pristine example of a large impact crater on Earth. Early structural models across Chicxulub were extremely divergent. They illustrate that we do not know how peak rings are formed, how stratigraphic uplifts are related to topographic peak rings, or how these morphological elements are related spatially to allogenic impact breccias and melt rocks. New reflection and refraction seismic data helped improve constraints on structural models of Chicxulub, and led to a better understanding of the cratering process for large impacts. There is now general agreement that the transient cavity at Chicxulub was 80-110 km in diameter. Impact-related structures within the target rocks are clearly observed in the reflection data, but there remains disagreement on the interpretation of some of these structural elements. If the outermost significant inward-facing asymmetric scarp locates the crater rim, Chicxulub has a diameter of 180-195 km. However, if the outermost topographic high locates the crater rim, Chicxulub probably has a crater diameter of between 250 and 270 km. Chicxulub has been interpreted as having the morphology of a peak ring crater and a multiring basin. There is no consensual model for the formation of rings in multiring basins. Once such a model is agreed upon, we will be in a better position to categorize the morphology of Chicxulub.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geophysical constraints on the size and structure of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Morgan, J
    Warner, M
    Grieve, R
    [J]. CATASTROPHIC EVENTS AND MASS EXTINCTIONS: IMPACTS AND BEYOND, 2002, 356 : 39 - 46
  • [2] GEOPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CHICXULUB IMPACT CRATER
    Gulick, S. P. S.
    Christeson, G. L.
    Barton, P. J.
    Grieve, R. A. F.
    Morgan, J. V.
    Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J.
    [J]. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 51 (01) : 31 - 52
  • [3] Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Morgan, J
    Warner, M
    Brittan, J
    Buffler, R
    Camargo, A
    Christeson, G
    Denton, P
    Hildebrand, A
    Hobbs, R
    Macintyre, H
    Mackenzie, G
    Maguire, P
    Marin, L
    Nakamura, Y
    Pilkington, M
    Sharpton, V
    Snyder, D
    Suarez, G
    Trejo, A
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 390 (6659) : 472 - 476
  • [4] Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Jo Morgan
    Mike Warner
    John the Chicxulub Working Group
    Richard Brittan
    Antonio Buffler
    Gail Camargo
    Paul Christeson
    Alan Denton
    Richard Hildebrand
    Hamish Hobbs
    Graeme Macintyre
    Peter Mackenzie
    Luis Maguire
    Yosio Marin
    Mark Nakamura
    Virgil Pilkington
    Dave Sharpton
    Gerardo Snyder
    Alberto Suarez
    [J]. Nature, 1997, 390 : 472 - 476
  • [5] Deep crustal structure of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Christeson, GL
    Nakamura, Y
    Buffler, RT
    Morgan, J
    Warner, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2001, 106 (B10) : 21751 - 21769
  • [6] Crustal structure of the Chicxulub Impact crater imaged with magnetotelluric exploration
    Unsworth, M
    Enriquez, OC
    Belmonte, S
    Arzate, J
    Bedrosian, P
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (16) : 35 - 1
  • [7] SIZE AND STRUCTURE OF THE CHICXULUB CRATER REVEALED BY HORIZONTAL GRAVITY GRADIENTS AND CENOTES
    HILDEBRAND, AR
    PILKINGTON, M
    CONNORS, M
    ORTIZALEMAN, C
    CHAVEZ, RE
    [J]. NATURE, 1995, 376 (6539) : 415 - 417
  • [8] Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Sean P. S. Gulick
    Penny J. Barton
    Gail L. Christeson
    Joanna V. Morgan
    Matthew McDonald
    Keren Mendoza-Cervantes
    Zulmacristina F. Pearson
    Anusha Surendra
    Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi
    Peggy M. Vermeesch
    Mike R. Warner
    [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1 : 131 - 135
  • [9] Surface expression of Chicxulub impact crater
    Alvarez, R
    Bonifaz, R
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH THEMATIC CONFERENCE: GEOLOGIC REMOTE SENSING - PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR REAL WORLD PROBLEMS, VOL I, 1996, : 515 - 524
  • [10] Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater
    Gulick, Sean P. S.
    Barton, Penny J.
    Christeson, Gail L.
    Morgan, Joanna V.
    McDonald, Matthew
    Mendoza-Cervantes, Keren
    Pearson, Zulmacristina F.
    Surendra, Anusha
    Urrutia-Fucugauchi, Jaime
    Vermeesch, Peggy M.
    Warner, Mike R.
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2008, 1 (02) : 131 - 135