Effect of notch and tack coat on the interface shear performance between asphalt layers

被引：0
|
作者：
Liu H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qiu Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[2] Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
[3] MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
来源：
Qiu, Yanjun (publicqiu@vip.163.com) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 51期
关键词：
Asphalt mixtures; Interlayer shear bond; Notch; Orthogonal design; Significance; Tack coat;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.011
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to evaluate the important order and significance of the type of asphalt mixtures (A) on both sides of the interface of pavement surface course, the notch (B) in the interface, the tack coat (C), and the two-way interactions (A×B, A×C and B×C) of the three factors that influence the interlayer shear strength, the orthogonal design was applied to make the test scheme. Three types of composite Marshall specimens were prepared by compaction method. The lower layer of specimens was 19 mm nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) dense-graded asphalt mixture (AC-20); and the upper layer was 13 mm NMAS dense-graded asphalt mixture (AC-13), AC-20, or 13 mm NMAS open-graded friction courses (OGFC-13), respectively. There were four treatments for the specimens interfaces, namely, neither notch nor tack coat (NNNT), no notch but tack coat (NNYT), no tack coat but notch (YNNT), and both notch and tack coat (YNYT). The interfaces of the specimens were directly sheared by the homemade interface shearing apparatus at 25℃. The results show that the average shear strength of the NNYT, YNNT, and YNYT interface is increased by 23.8%, 42.9%, and 53.9% respectively, compared with the average shear strength of the NNNT interface. By variance analysis, the effect of the three factors and their interactions on the shear bond strength can be ranked in a descending order as A, B, C, B×C, A×C, and A×B. The A, B, C, and the interaction of B×C are highly significant factors, and the interactions A×B and A×C are subordinate factors. © 2016, Editorial Department of Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：677 / 683
页数：6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Hu X., Walubita L., Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137, 1, pp. 28-36, (2011)
  • [2] Li L., Hao P., Effect of bonding condition between asphalt layers on behavior of pavement, COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals (CICTP), pp. 2955-2964, (2012)
  • [3] Romanoschi S., Metcalf J., Characterization of asphalt concrete layer interfaces, Transportation Research Record, 1778, pp. 132-139, (2001)
  • [4] Bai X., Effect of bonding condition between asphalt layer and semi-rigid layer on structural mechanics response of asphalt pavement, Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University: Natural Science, 28, 2, pp. 215-218, (2009)
  • [5] Mriana R.K., Andrew C.C., Nicholas H.T., Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance, Joumal of Transportation Engineering, 131, 11, pp. 880-888, (2005)
  • [6] Bognacki C.J., Frisvold A., Bennert T., Investigation of Asphalt Pavement Slippage Failures On Runway 4R-22L Newark International Airport, pp. 18-30, (2007)
  • [7] Muench S.T., Moomaw T., De-bonding of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements in Washington State: an Initial Investigation, pp. 5-26, (2008)
  • [8] Peng S., Yao Y., Chen J., Et al., Causes and countermeasures of early damage of asphalt concrete pavement in yunnan province, Highway, 4, pp. 81-84, (2009)
  • [9] West R.C., Zhang J., Moore J., Evaluation of Bond Strength between Pavement Layers, pp. 15-35, (2005)
  • [10] Zhao J., Consumption of tack coat oil in asphalt pavement, Transport Standardization, 232, pp. 42-44, (2010)
12