Experimental study on mitigation effects of water mist on blast wave

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao J. [1 ]
Li Q. [2 ]
Zhang L. [2 ]
Liu S. [1 ]
Jiang L. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Jiangsu, Nanjing
[2] Research Institute of China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited, Henan, Zhengzhou
来源
关键词
blast mitigation; impulse; overpressure; shock wave; water mist;
D O I
10.11883/bzycj-2023-0108
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To examine the mitigation characterisitics of blast wave in water mist, a comprehensive series of blast experiments were carried out utilizing a blast-driven shock tube with a 4 m length and 180 mm square inner cross-section. The blast wave was generated by detonating trinitrotoluene charges with masses of 7, 10 and 13 g within the shock tube. Five pressure gauges were installed to measure blast wave pressure within the spray region. In order to create varying water mist properties, a spray system was employed, which covered a distance of 3 m within the experimental setup. Droplet size and distribution were measured using a laser light scattering analyzer. The mitigation effect of water mist with two distinct properties on blast overpressure and impulse was evaluated. Results indicated that the pressure in the spray region raised in two stages. The first stage corresponded to the pressure associated with the transmitted shock wave, while the second stage was attributed to the secondary atomization and relaxation processes of the droplets. The longer the spray region traversed by the blast wave, the greater the mitigation effect on peak overpressure and impulse. Increased shock wave intensity diminished the mitigation effect of water mist on blast loads. Specifically, when water mist with a Sauter mean diameter of 136.04 μm and a volume fraction of 1.72×10−3 was employed, peak pressure values experienced a reduction ranging from 34.2% to 60.9%, while impulse values were reduced by 9% to 54%. On the other hand, when water mist with a Sauter mean diameter of 255.34 μm and a volume fraction of 3.43×10−3 was used, peak pressure values witnessed a reduction ranging from 48.4% to 78.6%, and impulse values were reduced by 14% to 66%. The mitigation coefficient of peak overpressure decreased linearly with increased scaled exchange surface area between blast wave and droplets. © 2023 Explosion and Shock Waves. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] SCHUNCK T, BASTIDE M, ECKENFELS D, Et al., Blast mitigation by water mist: the effect of the detonation configuration, Shock Waves, 30, 6, pp. 629-644, (2020)
  • [2] KONG X S, ZHOU H, ZHENG C, Et al., An experimental study on the mitigation effects of fine water mist on confined-blast loading and dynamic response of steel plates, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 134, (2019)
  • [3] TAMBA T, SUGIYAMA Y, OHTANI K, Et al., Comparison of blast mitigation performance between water layers and water droplets, Shock Waves, 31, 1, pp. 89-94, (2021)
  • [4] XU H B, CHEN L K, ZHANG D Z, Et al., Mitigation effects on the reflected overpressure of blast shock with water surrounding an explosive in a confined space [J], Defence Technology, 17, pp. 1071-1080, (2021)
  • [5] KONG X S, WANG Z T, KUANG Z, Et al., Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading, Explosion and Shock Waves, 41, 16, (2021)
  • [6] JIBA Z, SONO T J, MOSTERT F J., Implications of fine water mist environment on the post-detonation processes of a PE4 explosive charge in a semi-confined blast chamber, Defence Technology, 14, 5, pp. 366-372, (2018)
  • [7] PONTALIER Q, LOISEAU J, GOROSHIN S, Et al., Experimental investigation of blast mitigation and particle-blast interaction during the explosive dispersal of particles and liquids [J], Shock Waves, 28, 3, (2018)
  • [8] XU H B, ZHANG D Z, QIN X J, Et al., An investigation on mitigation effect of water surrounding an explosive on reflected overpressure of shock wave, Acta Armamentarii, 35, 7, pp. 1027-1031, (2014)
  • [9] LI C, ZHANG L, FANG Q, Et al., Performance based investigation on the construction of anti-blast water wall, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 81, pp. 17-33, (2015)
  • [10] JEON H, ELIASSON V., Shock wave interactions with liquid sheets, Experiments in Fluids, 58, 4, (2017)