Effects of Temperature and Residence Time on Mercury Control Using Activated Carbon Injection in Ultra-low Emission Coal-fired Power Plant

被引：0

作者：

Wang J. ^{[1
]}

Zhang Y. ^{[1
]}

Gu Y. ^{[1
]}

Liu Z. ^{[1
]}

Wang T. ^{[1
]}

Sui Z. ^{[1
]}

Xu H. ^{[1
]}

Pan W. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] National Thermal Power Engineering and Technology Research Center, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing

[2] Sanhe Power Generation Co.Ltd., Langfang, 065200, Hebei

来源：

Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering | 2019年 / 39卷 / 11期

基金：

国家重点研发计划;

关键词：

Activated carbon adsorption; Emission and control; Mercury; Ultra-low emission;

D O I：

10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.181778

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

For better understanding the effect of activated carbon on mercury emission in the flue gas of coal-fired power plant, mercury removal from flue gas was studied in the laboratory scale and the ultra-low emission power plant. The effects of temperature and residence time on the mercury captured using activated carbon were investigated. Results from a laboratory scale fixed bed reactor indicated that the optimal mercury captured temperature is 120℃. Activated carbon injection and mercury removal experiments were carried out in 300MW ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant, and the mercury emission concentration of wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) was 0.50~0.58μg/m3 before activated carbon injection. Activated carbon injection experiments were also carried out at two points. The first location was after selective catalytic reduction device (SCR) and before air preheater (APH)(350℃). The second location was before the low temperature economizer (LTE)and after the APH (121℃). The mercury concentration after WESP could reach as low as 0.11μg/m3, when the activated carbon was injected before the LTE. The results show that the effect of temperature on the adsorption and removal of mercury using activated carbon is more important than that of residence time. Compared with the injection after SCR, the removal efficiency of mercury in the flue gas is higher by the injection of activated carbon in front of the LTE. © 2019 Chin. Soc. for Elec. Eng.

引用

页码：3303 / 3311

页数：8

共 25 条

[1] Wang S., Zhang Y., Gu Y., Et al., Using modified fly ash for mercury emissions control for coal-fired power plant applications in China, Fuel, 181, pp. 1230-1237, (2016)
[2] Zhong L., Li W., Zhang Y., Et al., Kinetic studies of mercury adsorption in activated carbon modified by iodine steam vapor deposition method, Fuel, 188, pp. 343-351, (2017)
[3] Li G., Wu Q., Wang S., Et al., Improving flue gas mercury removal in waste incinerators by optimization of carbon injection rate, Environmental Science & Technology, 52, 4, pp. 1940-1945, (2018)
[4] Zhong L., Zhang Y., Ji Y., Et al., Synthesis of activated carbon from coal pitch for mercury removal in coal-fired power plants, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 123, 1, pp. 851-860, (2016)
[5] GB 13223-2011 Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants, (2012)
[6] Minamata convention on mercur(Chinese version), (2017)
[7] Pan W., Zhang Y., Li W., Et al., Mercury monitoring and controlling technologies for coal power plants, Science& Technology Review, 32, 33, pp. 57-60, (2014)
[8] Song C., Zhang Y., Hao J., Et al., Mercury emission characteristics from coal-fired power plant before and after ultra-low emission retrofitting, Research of Environmental Sciences, 30, 5, pp. 672-677, (2017)
[9] Zheng C., Zhang J., Zhao Y., Et al., Emission and Control of Mercury from Coal Combustion, (2010)
[10] Pavlish J.H., Holmes M.J., Benson S.A., Et al., Application of sorbents for mercury control for utilities burning lignite coal, Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 6-7, pp. 563-576, (2004)

← 1 2 3 →