Influence of Different Resolutions Data on Regional Simulation of Crop Model

被引：0
|
作者：
He L. [1 ]
Hou Y. [1 ]
Yu Q. [2 ,3 ]
Jin N. [2 ]
机构：
[1] National Meteorological Center, Beijing
[2] State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi
[3] School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, 2007, NSW
来源：
| 2018年 / Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery卷 / 49期
关键词：
Force data; Regional simulation; Spatial resolution; Uncertainty; WOFOST;
D O I：
10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2018.02.031
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Crop model is constructed on the field scale. There are simulated errors due to the up-scaling when it is applied from filed scale to larger scale. Regional applications of crop model are becoming universal methodologies to explore the interactions between crop, climate and management in agriculture systems to provide policy and decision making for food production. A spatial resolution should be determined before using crop model to simulate yield in the regional scale. There is a dilemma in considering the spatial resolution. A high spatial resolution simulation needs more hardware resource and expensive computing cost while a coarse resolution simulation would result in loss of spatial detail of variability. Therefore, exploring the uncertainties of regional simulation of crop model due to different spatial resolutions is essential to application of crop model in large scale. A WOFOST regional simulation platform was constructed at different spatial resolutions to quantify the simulation errors by spatial resolution of model force data. Five spatial resolution meteorological data (5 km, 10 km, 25 km and 50 km) were interpolated by the thin plate smoothing spline method which was provided by the software ANUSPLIN. The corresponding resolution soil parameters were extracted from a fine resolution soil database by spatial aggregation. Spatial management and crop cultivar parameters were calculated from observed agro-meteorological sites and then extended to different resolutions by Thiessen polygon method. The simulated yields were compared at different resolutions and statistical yields, and it was found that the average value of anthesis, maturity date, total above ground production and yield at potential yield level and water limited level did not have significant difference. However, there were more extreme values in the high resolution. Each simulation of four resolutions can perform the spatial distribution of crop development. Compared with the regional statistical yields, simulated water limited yield at different resolutions contributed to the variation of statistical yields by 75.4%~85.4%. The correlation analysis between potential yield and water-limited yield and climate factor indicated that the irradiation in the growing stage contributed to 16.6%~29.6% of variability of potential yield, the precipitation in the growing stage contributed to 13.3%~17.8% of variability of water-limited yield. The data storage capacity and computing cost at high resolution, i.e. 5 km was a hundred times more than coarse resolution, i.e. 50 km. The results provided theoretical and scientific basis for regional application, especially for selecting suitable spatial resolution for regional simulation. © 2018, Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：241 / 251
页数：10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] de Wit D.C., Photosynthesis of Leaf Canopies, (1965)
  • [2] Holzworth D.P., Snow V., Janssen S., Et al., Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects, Environmental Modelling & Software, 72, C, pp. 276-286, (2015)
  • [3] Gao L., Agricultural model research and agriculture science in the 21st century, Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 1, pp. 43-46, (2001)
  • [4] Lin Z., Mo X., Xiang Y., Research advances on crop models, Acta Agronomica Sinica, 29, 5, pp. 750-758, (2003)
  • [5] Rosenzweig C., Elliott J., Deryng D., Et al., Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 9, pp. 3268-3273, (2014)
  • [6] Tao F., Zhang Z., Liu J., Et al., Modelling the impacts of weather and climate variability on crop productivity over a large area: a new super-ensemble-based probabilistic projection, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 8, pp. 1266-1278, (2009)
  • [7] Xiong W., Holman I., Conway D., Et al., A crop model cross calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies, Ecological Modelling, 213, 3-4, pp. 365-380, (2008)
  • [8] Yang X., Chen F., Lin X., Et al., Potential benefits of climate change for crop productivity in China, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 208, pp. 76-84, (2015)
  • [9] Feng L., Mo Z., Huang W., Et al., A simulated study on the effects of seasonal drought on growth and yield of double cropping rice in Hunan Province, Acta Agronomica Sinica, 37, 5, pp. 895-902, (2011)
  • [10] Rosenzweig C., Jones J.W., Hatfield J.L., Et al., The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 170, 3, pp. 166-182, (2013)
12345