Performance Comparison of Autoregressive Runoff Prediction Methods for Different River Basins

被引:0
|
作者
Xie S. [1 ]
Huang Y. [1 ]
Li T. [1 ]
Chen B. [2 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Hydrosicence and, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[2] Daqiao Hydropower Development Corporation, Liangshan
关键词
ANN; ARMA; Mid-long term runoff prediction; Model; SVR;
D O I
10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2018.04.004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Runoff prediction for the next month with historical stream flow data is concerned by many researchers due to its importance for field practices.Therefore,many data-driven models were developed for forecasting runoff for the next month.Since lack of reliable weather forecasting for the next month and randomness and nonlinearity of monthly runoff time series,the performances of those developed runoff prediction methods present significant differences.In this paper,ARMA model,ANN model and SVR model are used to forecast runoff for the next month at three river basins.The MAPE is used to evaluate the forecasting performances of these three models.The MAPE comparison results show that the performance of the SVR model is the best one among three models.The comparison of forecasting results among three river basins demonstrates that MAPE values are significant different for three river basins,which might be caused by different coefficient of variance (CV) of historical runoff time series and the correlation coefficient (Rlag1) between two adjacent months' runoffs.Moreover,MAPE values of three river basins have significant linear correlation with both CV and |Rlag1| values.When CV and |Rlag1| are both used to calculate MAPE,the coefficient of determination is 0.80.Further analysis shows that the difference of river basin characteristics is the crucial reason resulting in the different MAPE values (forecasting performance) for three models at three river basins. © 2018, The Editorial Board of Journal of Basic Science and Engineering. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 736
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Xian C., Zhang Y., Zou X., Et al., Analysis of hydrological time-scale of mid-long term runoff forecasting, Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 48, 6, pp. 739-743, (2015)
  • [2] Zhao T., Yang D., Li M., Exceedance probability method for mid-term and long-term streamflow prediction, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 42, 6, pp. 692-699, (2011)
  • [3] Zhou H., Wu L., Guo Y., Mid- and long term hydrologic forecasting for drainage area based on WNN and FRM, International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 7-12, (2006)
  • [4] Li H., Xie M., Jiang S., Recognition method for mid- to long-term runoff forecasting factors based on global sensitivity analysis in the Nenjiang River Basin, Hydrological Processes, 26, 18, pp. 2827-2837, (2012)
  • [5] Xu S., Wang F., Li H., Et al., Study of long-term runoff forecast at the Zhenxi Station on the Taoer River, Journal of China Hydrology, 27, 5, pp. 86-89, (2007)
  • [6] Zhang S., Zhang Y., Liu J., Et al., Ten-days monthly runoff forecasting in Datong Station based on stepwise regression and LMBP algorithm, Water Resources and Power, pp. 13-15, (2014)
  • [7] Li H.Y., Tian L., Xie Y.N.W.M., Improvement of mid- to long-term runoff forecasting based on physical causes: application in Nenjiang basin, China, Hydrological Sciences Journal/journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 58, 7, pp. 1414-1422, (2013)
  • [8] Kalra A., Ahmad S., Nayak A., Increasing streamflow forecast lead time for snowmelt-driven catchment based on large-scale climate patterns, Advances in Water Resources, 53, 1, pp. 150-162, (2013)
  • [9] Carlson R.F., Maccormick A.J.A., Watts D.G., Application of linear random models to four annual streamflow series, Water Resources Research, 6, 4, pp. 1070-1078, (1970)
  • [10] Zhang J., Wei W., Long time runoff forecasting with neural network method for Long Yangxia hydropower station, Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, pp. 99-104, (1995)