Optimization of concrete temperature control measures based on improved particle swarm optimization and finite element method

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Qiang, Sheng
[2] 1,Zheng, Weizhong
[3] 1,Zhang, Yongqiang
[4] Liu, Lianjian
来源
Qiang, Sheng | 1600年 / Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering卷 / 30期
关键词
Costs - Concrete dams - Concretes - Safety factor - Particle swarm optimization (PSO) - Cracks - Personal computers - Temperature control;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.16.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For the selection of temperature control measures for massive concrete, traditional methods are fully in accordance with the industry standard requirements and subject to repeated artificial amending by practical experience in engineering design and construction. Therefore, it is inefficient and limited by the designer's experience. In this paper, an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) combined with concrete temperature field and stress field based on the finite element method (FEM) was tested to select the optimal concrete temperature control measures. In the simulation cases, two optimization objectives were defined. The first objective was that the tensile stress of multi feature points should satisfy a safety-cracking factor of at least 1.80. The second was that the whole temperature measures cost should be minimal. The optimization computation was implemented separately with only a single objective for safety factor and both objectives for safety and cost. From the results of 6 calculation cases for a fictitious small-scale concrete dam structure, the following conclusions were drawn. 1) The results show that the proposed method can achieve automatic finding of the temperature control measures optimization, and the optimization results are more scientific and more reasonable. If the ranges of the temperature control parameters can be defined reasonably, the dependence of optimization on humans can be decreased. It will increase the scientificity and persuasion of the temperature control scheme, especially under the complicated situation of more optimization objects, which is very difficult to draw a most reasonable quantitative measures composition. 2) The efficiency of the whole research is improved noticeably. According to experience, if the safety factor is taken as the only objective, the optimization will cost 5 to 7 days by a medium level researcher. In this paper, the time cost of the intelligent optimization is only 2.2 days. 3) After considering the two-objective optimization, the total costs of temperature control measures can be significantly reduced by at least 9% under the condition of ensuring crack-prevention safety. 4) The total calculation time will be influenced by the types, the number and changes of temperature control measures, the locations and number of feature points, and the number of optimization objectives. A high performance personal computer is tested in this paper. The optimization time cost of 5 feature points and 300 days of simulation is 2.7 times the one of 3 feature points and 80 days of simulation. The optimization time cost of the dual-objective is 1.6 times the single-objective. Therefore, a high performance parallel machine should be used to implement the proposed intelligent method for a large-scale engineering structure in a multi-objective, multi-measure, and multi-feature-point optimization task. 5) If the equivalent cooling pipe algorithm is adopted to replace the current explicit one, the optimization for pipe distances will become more feasible. 6) The cost of different temperature control measures in this paper may not be suitable for every construction site. In a factual application case, the checked prices and cost weight should be considered. For future research, how to define the reasonable weights for different feature points at different locations of different structures is the next challenge.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thermal optimization of IGBT modules based on finite element method and particle swarm optimization
    Omid Alavi
    Mohammad Abdollah
    Abbas Hooshmand Viki
    Journal of Computational Electronics, 2017, 16 : 930 - 938
  • [2] Thermal optimization of IGBT modules based on finite element method and particle swarm optimization
    Alavi, Omid
    Abdollah, Mohammad
    Viki, Abbas Hooshmand
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ELECTRONICS, 2017, 16 (03) : 930 - 938
  • [3] A Method of Testability Optimization Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization
    Hou, Wenkui
    Yao, Guoping
    Yan, Junfeng
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (PHM-2014 HUNAN), 2014, : 451 - 455
  • [4] Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method
    王元元
    张彬乾
    陈迎春
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2011, 32 (10) : 1245 - 1254
  • [5] Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method
    Yuan-yuan Wang
    Bin-qian Zhang
    Ying-chun Chen
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2011, 32 : 1245 - 1254
  • [6] Improved Topological Optimization Method Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
    Guan, Jie
    Zhang, Wenqun
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 52067 - 52074
  • [7] Robust airfoil optimization based on improved particle swarm optimization method
    Wang, Yuan-yuan
    Zhang, Bin-qian
    Chen, Ying-chun
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS-ENGLISH EDITION, 2011, 32 (10) : 1245 - 1254
  • [8] An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Method Based on Chaos
    Yang, Zuyuan
    Yang, Huafen
    Yang, You
    Zhang, Lihui
    2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION (ICNC), 2014, : 209 - 213
  • [9] An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Method for Nonlinear Optimization
    Liu, Shiwei
    Hua, Xia
    Shan, Longxiang
    Wang, Dongqiao
    Liu, Yong
    Wang, Qiaohua
    Sun, Yanhua
    He, Lingsong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2024, 2024
  • [10] Temperature Control Optimization for Heat Pipe Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
    Zhu Xi
    Du Chunlin
    Li Zhengju
    Wang Jing
    Feng Yao
    2018 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL (IMCCC 2018), 2018, : 920 - 923