Thermoeconomic analysis and performance evaluation of gas-steam combined cycle power plant based on H&S model

被引:0
|
作者
Li H.-K. [1 ]
Chen J.-H. [1 ]
Sheng D.-R. [1 ]
Li W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Thermal Science and Power Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
来源
Chen, Jian-Hong (power@zju.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Zhejiang University卷 / 50期
关键词
Combined cycle power plant; Dissipative component; Evaluation index; H&S model; Thermoeconomic cost;
D O I
10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.01.017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditional E&S model could not define the fuel and product of dissipative components conceivably in thermodynamics viewpoint. The productive components were overcharged. A new model was established for gas-steam combined cycle power plant based on structure theory of thermoeconomics and H&S theory in order to conduct the cost calculation and performance analysis of energy systems more reasonably and effectively. The composition of each component's thermoeconomic cost was analyzed and the concept of dissipative cost was proposed. The traditional evaluation indexes of relative cost difference and exergyeconomic coefficient were improved based on the H&S model. The typical 9FA single shaft gas-steam combined cycle generating unit was used to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the model. Results show that the structure theory of thermoeconomics based on H&S model can reasonably deal with dissipative components' definition of fuel and product. The productive components can be fairly evaluated. For the condensate pump and the combustion chamber, it is necessary to reduce negentropy cost caused by irreversibility. For the air compressor and the steam turbine, the direction of improvement is to reduce non-energy cost. © 2016, Zhejiang University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Kehlhofer R., Bachmann R., Nielson H., Et al., Combined-cycle Gas and Steam Turbine Power Plants, (2009)
  • [2] Wade N.M., Energy and cost allocation in dual-purpose power and desalination plants, Desalination, 123, 2, pp. 115-125, (1999)
  • [3] El-Sayed Y.M., Application of exergy to design, Energy Conversion and Management, 43, 9, pp. 1165-1185, (2002)
  • [4] Valero A., Correas L., Zaleta A., Et al., On the thermoeconomic approach to the diagnosis of energy system malfunctions: Part 1: the TADEUS problem, Energy, 29, 12, pp. 1875-1887, (2004)
  • [5] Petrakopoulou F., Boyano A., Cabrera M., Et al., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a combined cycle power plant with chemical looping technology, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 3, pp. 475-482, (2011)
  • [6] Ahmadi P., Dincer I., Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using multimodal genetic algorithm (MGA), Energy, 35, 12, pp. 5161-5172, (2010)
  • [7] Santos J., Nascimento M., Lora E., Et al., On The negentropy application in thermoeconomics: a fictitious or an exergy component flow?, International Journal of Thermodynamics, 12, 4, pp. 163-176, (2009)
  • [8] Valero A., Serra L., Uche J., Fundamentals of exergy cost accounting and thermoeconomics. Part I: theory, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 128, 1, pp. 1-8, (2006)
  • [9] Valero A., Serra L., Uche J., Fundamentals of exergy cost accounting and thermoeconomics Part II: applications, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 128, 1, pp. 9-15, (2006)
  • [10] Lourenco A.B., Santos J.J.C.S., Donatelli J.L.M., Exergy analysis and fuel exergy allocation in a HTGR direct combined cycle, 2012 20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering and the ASME 2012 Power Conference, pp. 137-144, (2012)