Seismic performance of self-centering concrete shear wall: State-of-the-art review and prospects

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
Zheng W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
[2] Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control (Harbin Institute of Technology), Ministry of Education, Harbin
[3] Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters (Harbin Institute of Technology), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin
关键词
Earthquake resilience; Residual drift; Seismic performance; Self-centering shear wall; Unbonded post-tensioning;
D O I
10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201807208
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Post-earthquake resilience of engineering structures is an important research area of sustainable earthquake engineering in recent years. Restoration and collapse control are realized with the constraint at the base released and the wall panels post-tensioned by unbonded prestressing tendons, which can reduce damage level and even eliminate residual drift owing to the gap-opening mechanism. As an important component of earthquake resilient structural system, self-centering concrete shear wall system is developing continuously. Self-centering shear wall such as controlled rocking wall, hybrid rocking wall, coupled wall with vertical joint, and coupled wall with coupling beam can accomplish restoration, but various dissipating devices result in significantly different levels of energy dissipating. Traditional force-based design is not applicable, so displacement-based performance design should be presented with the improvement of residual drift control, definition of performance level, and section limit state. Fiber model, lumped plasticity model, multi-spring model, and finite element model can accurately simulate the behavior of self-centering shear wall, but there are some differences in parameter sensitivity.Thus, some current research challenges and prospects were presented to provide theoretical and technical support for the development and application of self-centering shear wall structure system: the elastic and inelastic behavior of prestressing tendon which can cause prestress loss and insufficient deformation capacity during rocking, the connection performance between self-centering shear wall and adjacent structural components such as the floor system and its influence on self-centering ability, collapse control with the failure of post-tensioning tendon and dissipating device, and utilization of multiple dissipating rocking interfaces between wall panels to mitigate higher mode effects and estimation of residual drift. © 2018, Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:12
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] Xie L., Ma Y., Zhai C., Performance-Based seismic Design and Design Ground Motion, (2009)
  • [2] Pauley T., Hu S., Seismic design procedure for ductile reinforced concrete structures, Journal of Building Structures, 4, (1983)
  • [3] Housner G.W., The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 53, 2, (1963)
  • [4] Hukelbridge A.A., Clough R.W., Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame, (1977)
  • [5] Hukelbridge A.A., Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift, (1977)
  • [6] Priestley M.J.N., Evison R.J., Carr A.J., Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 11, 3, (1978)
  • [7] Meek J.W., Dynamic response of tipping core buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 6, 5, (1978)
  • [8] Yim C.S., Chopra A.K., Penzien J., Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8, 6, (1980)
  • [9] Aslam M., Godden W.G., Scalise D.T., Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 106, 2, (1980)
  • [10] Psycharis I.N., Jennings P.C., Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 11, 1, (1983)