Research development in nonlinear backstepping control method of carrier-based aircraft landing

被引：1
|
作者：
Wu W. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Hu Y. [2 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Aeronautical Instument and Electric Control System, Naval Aeronautical University, Qingdao
[2] Department of Control Engineering, Naval Aeronautical University, Yantai
来源：
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2018年 / 40卷 / 07期
关键词：
Backstepping; Carrier-based aircraft; Constrained command filtered backstepping; Landing control; Nonlinear method;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.07.24
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Currently the carrier-based aircraft landing control is mostly based on linear control methods, while the nonlinear characteristics of the model and the airwake disturbance may lead to the failure with these methods. Therefore, it is necessary to apply the nonlinear control method to the landing control field. Firstly, this paper reviews the nonlinear control method in application to carrier-based aircraft landing, and summarizes advantages and deficiencies of nonlinear methods. Secondly, the backstepping nonlinear method is emphatically analyzed. On the basis of traditional backstepping, and combining with the carrier-based aircraft landing rudder limited problem caused by the environmental disturbances and radar noise, the development of the constrained command filtered backstepping (CCFB) method is mainly summarized. The advantages and disadvantages of CCFB method are analyzed, and the possibility of introducing CCFB into the carrier-based landing control is discussed. Finally, the future development trends are forecasted. © 2018, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1578 / 1587
页数：9
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Gautam A., Sujit P.B., Saripalli S., A survey of autonomous landing techniques for UAVs, Proc.of the International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems, pp. 1210-1218, (2014)
  • [2] Steinberg M.L., Page A.B., A comparison of neural, fuzzy, evolutionary, and adaptive approaches for carrier landing, Proc.of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, (2001)
  • [3] Zhen Z.Y., Wang X.H., Jiang J., Et al., Research development in guidance and control of automatic carrier landing of carrier-based aircraft, Acta Aeronautica et AsrtonauticaSinica, 38, 2, pp. 122-143, (2017)
  • [4] Morse W.D., Ossman A., Model following reconfigurable flight control system for the AFTI/F-16, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 13, 6, pp. 969-976, (2012)
  • [5] Lungu R., Lungu M., Grigorie L.T., ALSs with conventional and fuzzy controllers considering wind shear and gyro errors, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 26, 4, pp. 794-813, (2013)
  • [6] Lungu R., Lungu M., Grigorie L.T., Automatic control of aircraft in longitudinal plane during landing, IEEE Trans.on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 49, 2, pp. 1338-1350, (2013)
  • [7] Nho K., Agarwal R., Automatic landing system design using fuzzy logic, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 23, 2, pp. 298-304, (2013)
  • [8] Rugh W.J., Shamma J.S., Survey research on gain scheduling, Automatica, 36, 10, pp. 1401-1425, (2000)
  • [9] Nichols R.A., Reichert R.T., Rugh W.J., Gain scheduling for H-infinity controllers: a flight control example, IEEE Trans.on Control Systems Technology, 1, 2, pp. 69-79, (1993)
  • [10] Stein G., Hartmann G.L., Hendrick R., Adaptive control laws for F-8 flight test, IEEE Trans.on Automatic Control, 22, 5, pp. 758-767, (1975)
12345678910