Seismic response of friction sliding isolation frame structure under different reserved slippages

被引:0
|
作者
Zhan M. [1 ]
Wang S. [1 ]
Liu J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an
[2] Shaanxi Research Institute of Building Sciences, Xi'an
来源
Zhan, Meng (zhanyi313@163.com) | 1600年 / Harbin Institute of Technology卷 / 48期
关键词
Bouc-Wen model; Displacement-limited and energy dissipation; Energy response; Reserved slippage; Simulink simulation;
D O I
10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2016.06.017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To study the seismic response of isolated structure under different reserved slippage, mild steel cone rod was taken as limit and energy dissipation device, Stateflow logic diagram was applied to simulate the motion state of isolation layer, and Bouc-Wen model was used to describe the hysteretic characteristic of elastic-plastic bar limit. MATLAB/Simulink simulation model of friction sliding isolation frame structure was established, the dynamic and energy response was analyzed, and the dynamic response of pure friction structure was compared with the shaking table test. Results show that the simulation results are consistent with experimental results. With the increase of reserved slippage, the acceleration response of the upper structure is not significantly increased. But isolation layer slippage is increased and limit device deformation is decreased. Damping energy dissipation has little to do with reserved slippage. The slippage change mainly changes earthquake input energy, which has less influence to other energy index. © 2016, Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:5
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Lu X.L., Zhou Q., Dynamic analysis method of a combined energy dissipation system and its experimental verification, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 6, pp. 1251-1265, (2002)
  • [2] Yang G., Spencer B.F., Carlson J.D., Et al., Large-scale MR fluid dampers modeling and dynamic performance considerations, Engineering Structures, 24, 3, pp. 309-323, (2002)