Life cycle assessment and cost evaluation of emerging technologies at early stages: The case of continuous flow synthesis of Rufinamide

被引:14
|
作者
Grimaldi F. [1 ]
de Leon Izeppi G.A. [2 ]
Kirschneck D. [2 ]
Lettieri P. [1 ]
Escribà-Gelonch M. [3 ,4 ]
Hessel V. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London
[2] Microinnova Engineering GmbH, Allerheiligen bei Wildon
[3] Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
[4] Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
[5] The University of Adelaide, Adelaide
关键词
anticipatory assessment; continuous flow synthesis; cost analysis; emerging technologies; life cycle assessment; sustainability; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1002/amp2.10043
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the pharma and fine chemical industries, the development of continuous flow technologies is a process intensification step of primary importance towards the manufacturing of high-quality products, while reducing the environmental impact and cost of production. The sustainability and profitability of a process can be measured through life cycle Assessment and cost evaluation. However, when applied to emerging technologies, these need to be performed at different stages of the process development in order to limit the uncertainties arising from the scale-up, and hence providing high-fidelity projections of environmental impacts and costs at larger scales. The output of the assessment can in fact vary significantly depending on the maturity of the technology and this translates into having different results at commercial scale compared to early estimations. Therefore, in this article, we perform an assessment at two different scales of production, lab and mini-pilot scale, with the aim of quantifying the uncertainties of the assessment related to the scale-up, identifying the hotspots of the system, and hence providing guidelines for the further steps of process development. The subject of the assessment is the continuous flow synthesis of Rufinamide. It is the first time that this synthesis is evaluated at pilot-scale. The results show that low yields in the cycloaddition drastically affect the waste management and the production of precursors, and hence increases environmental impacts and cost of production. This calls for the need of prioritizing the optimization of this synthesis step in order to deploy a green and economically competitive production technology. © 2020 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity
    Bergerson, Joule A.
    Brandt, Adam
    Cresko, Joe
    Carbajales-Dale, Michael
    MacLean, Heather L.
    Matthews, H. Scott
    McCoy, Sean
    McManus, Marcelle
    Miller, Shelie A.
    Morrow, William R., III
    Posen, I. Daniel
    Seager, Thomas
    Skone, Timothy
    Sleep, Sylvia
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: A review
    Moni, Sheikh Moniruzzaman
    Mahmud, Roksana
    High, Karen
    Carbajales-Dale, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) : 52 - 63
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of emerging environmental technologies in the early stage of development: A case study on nanostructured materials
    Bartolozzi, Irene
    Daddi, Tiberio
    Punta, Carlo
    Fiorati, Andrea
    Iraldo, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [4] Life cycle assessment for emerging technologies: Case studies for photovoltaic and wind power
    Jungbluth, N
    Bauer, C
    Dones, R
    Frischknecht, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2005, 10 (01): : 24 - 34
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of multi-step rufinamide synthesis - from isolated reactions in batch to continuous microreactor networks
    Ott, Denise
    Borukhova, Svetlana
    Hessel, Volker
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2016, 18 (04) : 1096 - 1116
  • [6] Illustrating Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Photovoltaic Technologies
    Wender, Ben A.
    Foley, Rider W.
    Prado-Lopez, Valentina
    Ravikumar, Dwarakanath
    Eisenberg, Daniel A.
    Hottle, Troy A.
    Sadowski, Jathan
    Flanagan, William P.
    Fisher, Angela
    Laurin, Lise
    Bates, Matthew E.
    Linkov, Igor
    Seager, Thomas P.
    Fraser, Matthew P.
    Guston, David H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (18) : 10531 - 10538
  • [7] The role of thermodynamics in Life Cycle Assessment of existing and emerging technologies
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Ukidwe, Nandan U.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2006, : 15 - +
  • [8] Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies
    Spatari, Sabrina
    Bagley, David M.
    MacLean, Heather L.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) : 654 - 667
  • [9] Statistical evaluation of input-side metrics for life cycle impact assessment of emerging technologies
    Zhang, Yi
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 117 - +
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: The case of milk ultra-high pressure homogenisation
    Valsasina, Lucia
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Smetana, Sergiy
    Georget, Erika
    Mathys, Alexander
    Heinz, Volker
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 : 2209 - 2217