Separation of copper and arsenic in copper smelting dust by Na2S-NaOH leaching assisted with glow discharge plasma

被引:0
|
作者
Wang Q. [1 ]
Guo L. [2 ]
Chen S. [1 ]
Xue Y. [1 ]
Du D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials Science of the State Ethnic Affairs Commission and Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei
[2] State Key Laboratory of Biological Geology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2017年 / 68卷 / 05期
关键词
Arsenic and copper; Copper smelting dust; Glow discharge plasma; Leaching; Oxidation; Selectivity; Separation;
D O I
10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161475
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selective leaching of arsenic and copper in copper smelting dust (referred to as "soot") was investigated by Na2S-NaOH leaching process with assistance of glow discharge plasma. Results showed that glow discharge plasma could enhance alkaline leaching capacity. The corresponding leaching ratios of arsenic and copper were reached to 92.52% and 7.76% at condition of 10 min discharge time, 500 W discharge power, 150 Pa discharge pressure, and 0.9 cm plate spacing. The leaching process reduced arsenic and copper content in soot from 7.11% to 0.45% and from 2.62% to 2.42%, respectively. XPS, XRD, and speciation analysis of heavy metals indicated that glow discharge plasma was able to oxidize As(III) to As(V) and Cu(I) to Cu(II), which As(V) was more easily leached than As(III) under alkaline condition. In conclusion, glow discharge plasma assisted Na2S-NaOH leaching process proves to be an efficient way of removing both arsenic and copper from soot so the soot can be further utilized after toxic content reduction. © All Right Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1932 / 1939
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Ostrowski S.R., Wilbur S., Chou C.H.S.J., Et al., Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's 1997 priority list of hazardous substances. Latent effects-carcinogenesis, neurotoxicology, and developmental deficits in humans and animals, Toxicology and Industrial Health, 15, 7, pp. 602-644, (1999)
  • [2] Guo L., Zhao Y.P., Du D.Y., Mechanism of removing arsenic and cadmium with ferric chloride, CIESC Journal, 65, 10, pp. 4118-4122, (2014)
  • [3] Alloway B.J., Ayres D.C., Chemical Principles of Environmental Pollution, pp. 216-218, (1997)
  • [4] Mandal B.K., Suzuki K.T., Arsenic round the world: a review, Talanta, 58, 1, pp. 201-235, (2002)
  • [5] Montenegro V., Sano H., Fujisawa T., Recirculation of high arsenic content copper smelting dust to smelting and converting processes, Miner. Eng., 49, pp. 184-189, (2013)
  • [6] Guo X., Shi J., Yi Y., Et al., Separation and recovery of arsenic from arsenic-bearing dust, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3, 3, pp. 2236-2242, (2015)
  • [7] Tongamp W., Takasaki Y., Shibayama A., Selective leaching of arsenic from enargite in NaHS-NaOH media, Hydrometallurgy, 101, 1, pp. 64-68, (2010)
  • [8] Li Y., Liu Z., Li Q., Et al., Alkaline oxidative pressure leaching of arsenic and antimony bearing dusts, Hydrometallurgy, 166, pp. 41-47, (2016)
  • [9] Lewis A.E., Review of metal sulphide precipitation, Hydrometallurgy, 104, 2, pp. 222-234, (2010)
  • [10] Wu Y.L., Xue Z.F., Hao S.T., Thermodynamics and kinetics of alkaline leaching of arsenic in copper smelting dust, Nonferrous metal (Extractive Metallurgurgy), 4, pp. 3-7, (2013)