Performance evaluation of guidance and control system for hypersonic vehicle

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhang D. [1 ]
Ma P. [1 ]
Chao T. [1 ]
Wang S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Control and Simulation Center, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源：
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2018年 / 40卷 / 08期
关键词：
Experiment design; Guidance and control system; Hypersonic vehicle; Performance evaluation;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.08.20
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The numerous factors have an impact on the performance of guidance and control system for hypersonic vehicle. Thus, a great quantity of simulation experiments is needed to obtain the accurate evaluation conclusion, leading to the poor evaluation efficiency. To slove this problem of performance evaluation, a performance evaluation method, applicable to hypersonic vehicles is investigated. Firstly, the closed-loop vehicle model containing the guidance and control law is built and factors affecting the vehicle are analyzed. Furthermore, the main influencing factors are selected as experimental factors and the sampling scheme is obtained in the sampling space based on the optimal Latin hypercube experiment design method. In conjunction with simulation data, the evaluation conclusion is gotten. Finally, the instance of performance evaluation verifies that the proposed approach is effective and feasible. © 2018, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1811 / 1816
页数：5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Sun S., Zhang H.M., Zhou D., A survey of terminal guidance law, Aerospace Control, 30, 1, pp. 86-96, (2012)
  • [2] John M.H., Robert E.J., Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicle: test results, Proc.of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, pp. 5-8, (2002)
  • [3] Ekici S., Sohret Y., Coban K., Et al., Performance evaluation of an experimental turbojet engine, International Journal of Turbo & Jet Engines, 34, 4, pp. 1-11, (2016)
  • [4] Elnashar G.A., Dynamics modelling, performance evaluation and stability analysis of an autonomous underwater vehicle, International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 21, 3, pp. 306-320, (2014)
  • [5] Liu Y.H., Fang P.P., Bian D.D., Et al., Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for the motion performance of autonomous underwater vehicles, Ocean Engineering, 88, 5, pp. 568-577, (2014)
  • [6] Rusnak I., Weiss H., Barkana I., Improving the perfor-mance of existing missile autopilot using simple adaptive control, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 28, 7, pp. 732-749, (2014)
  • [7] Ouda A.N., A robust adaptive control approach to missile autopilot design, International Journal of Dynamics & Control, 1, pp. 1-33, (2017)
  • [8] Pywell M., Midgley-Davies M., Improved test capabilities for cost-effective performance evaluation of airborne electronic warfare systems, Aeronautical Journal, 114, 1158, pp. 527-547, (2010)
  • [9] Zhang L., Li H.X., Research on anti-interference performance evaluation method of ship-to-air missile infrared guidance system, Ordnance Industry Automation, 34, 11, pp. 17-19, (2015)
  • [10] Sun J.B., Ge B.F., Li J.C., Et al., Operation Network Modeling With Degenerate Causal Strengths for Missile Defense Systems, IEEE Systems Journal, 12, 1, pp. 274-284, (2018)
123