Robust design of continuous compaction measured value based on dual response surface methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Nie Z. [1 ]
Xie Y. [1 ]
Jiao T. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha
来源
| 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 38期
关键词
Box-Behnken design; Continuous compaction check; Dual response surface methodology; Robust design;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2016.06.014
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The robust design of continuous compaction measured value is aimed at choosing the optimal combination of the controllable factors to reduce the sensitivity of the continuous compaction check to the noise factors, thus effectively improving the accuracy of measurement. Based on the dual response surface methodology and coupled with desirability function, the mean and variance of CMV were taken as optimization objectives to establish two second-order polynomial models. Using the Box-Behnken design method, the continuous compaction check tests were carried out in the Zhijiang construction site of Shanghai-Kunming High-Speed Railway, with amplitude, excitation frequency and roller speed as the controllable factors. The results demonstrated that the effect degree of the 3 factors on the stability of continuous compaction measured value was in the order of excitation frequency, amplitude and roller speed. Based on the desirability function, the optimal combination of vibratory compaction technology parameters was obtained: excitation frequency of 28.0 Hz, roller speed of 4.0 km/h and amplitude of 1.10 mm. The applicability and the accuracy of the optimal combination of vibratory compaction technology parameters were verified through the field test. © 2016, Editorial Office of Journal of the China Railway Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Thurner H., Sandstrom A., A New Device for Instant Compaction Control, Proceedings of International Conference on Compaction, 2, pp. 611-614, (1980)
  • [2] Nie Z., Jiao T., Wang X., Et al., Study on Probability Distribution Models of Continuous Compaction Indicators, Journal of Zhengzhou University: Engineering Science, 35, 2, pp. 15-18, (2014)
  • [3] Mooney M.A., Rinehart R.V., Facas N.W., Intelligent Soil Compaction Systems, (2010)
  • [4] Thompson M.J., White D.J., Estimating Compaction of Cohesive Soils from Machine Drive Power, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134, 12, pp. 1771-1777, (2008)
  • [5] Camargo F., Larsen B., Chadbourn B., Et al., Intelligent Compaction: A Minnesota Case History, 54th Annual University of Minnesota Geotechnical Conference, (2006)
  • [6] Mooney M.A., Rinehart R.V., In Situ Soil Response to Vibratory Loading and Its Relationship to Roller-measured Soil Stiffness, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135, 8, pp. 1022-1031, (2009)
  • [7] van Susante P.J., Mooney M.A., Capturing Nonlinear Vibratory Roller Compactor Behavior through Lumped Parameter Modeling, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 134, 8, pp. 684-693, (2008)
  • [8] Lin D.K.J., Tu W.Z., Dual Response Surface Optimization, Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 1, pp. 34-39, (1995)
  • [9] Ferreira S.L.C., Bruns R.E., Ferreira H.S., Et al., Box-Behnken Design: An Alternative for the Optimization of Analytical Methods, Analytica Chimica Acta, 597, 2, pp. 179-186, (2007)
  • [10] Roy R.K., Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and Process Improvement, (2002)