An evaluation strategy of trajectory optimization algorithms for hypersonic reentry vehicle

被引:0
|
作者
Dong C. [1 ]
Cai Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
关键词
Algorithm evaluation; Hypersonic reentry; Trajectory optimization;
D O I
10.7652/xjtuxb201604005
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A comprehensive evaluation strategy is proposed to deal with the evaluation of various trajectory optimization algorithms for the hypersonic reentry vehicle. An integrated index system is established by taking the stability and real-time performance of each algorithm itself as well as the feasibility, security, transitivity and optimality of its optimization result into account. And the calculation of index weights is transformed into an optimization problem based on the pairwise judgement matrix of the analytic hierarchy process, and the Euclidean distance and the number of violations are used as precision measures. The genetic algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. Then, the normalized decision matrix is obtained, and a weighted grey technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed by synthesizing the nearness degree in both the space and curve between the algorithm data and the ideal control groups to achieve the final evaluation results. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy uses objective data to quantify the performance of trajectory optimization algorithms, and forms a comparative evaluation standard for various algorithms. The strategy can help designers quickly select an optimal algorithm according to different mission requirements and avoid blindness and subjectivity. © 2016, Editorial Office of Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Zhao J., Zhou R., Jin X., Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 25, 4, pp. 627-639, (2014)
  • [2] Tancredi U., Grassi M., Corraro F., Et al., Robustness analysis for terminal phases of reentry flight, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 32, 5, pp. 1679-1683, (2009)
  • [3] Hanson J., Jones R., Krupp D., Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: test results, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 4561-4569, (2002)
  • [4] Brunner C.W., Lu P., Comparison of fully numerical predictor-corrector and Apollo skip entry guidance algorithms, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 59, 3, pp. 517-540, (2012)
  • [5] Ma W., Research on evaluation method of guidance and control performance for hypersonic vehicle, Aerospace Control, 30, 4, pp. 7-12, (2012)
  • [6] Rinat K., Ben-Asher J.Z., Worst-case distributions for performance evaluation of proportionally guided missiles, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 23, 5, pp. 895-898, (2000)
  • [7] Dong C., Cai Y., Orthogonal design based evaluation for trajectory optimization algorithms, The 32nd Chinese Control Conference, pp. 8542-8545, (2013)
  • [8] Saaty T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 1, pp. 83-98, (2008)
  • [9] Siraj S., Mikhailov L., Keane J.A., Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization, European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 2, pp. 461-471, (2012)
  • [10] Olson D.L., Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 7, pp. 721-727, (2004)