A Kriging based learning function for structural reliability analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Sun Z. [1 ]
Li R. [1 ]
Yan Y. [1 ]
Wang J. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang
来源
Sun, Zhili (zhlsun@mail.neu.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Harbin Institute of Technology卷 / 49期
关键词
Active learning; Failure probability; Kriging model; Monte Carlo method; Structural reliability;
D O I
10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201604121
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the efficiency of Kriging based structural reliability analysis, a new adaptive learning function VF is proposed after analyzing the weakness of existing learning functions. The learning function VF combines variance and joint probability density function both of which can affect the accuracy of estimated failure probability. This method can avoid wasting samples caused by sampling in the area where the value of joint probability density function is low, and increase learning efficiency. Firstly, a large number of candidate sample points are generated by Monte Carlo method, and the point that maximizes the proposed learning function value is defined as the best one. Secondly, a suitable stopping condition is proposed, which can not only ensure the accuracy of failure probability but also reduce iterations dramatically. Finally, two numerical examples are analyzed to show that the proposed method requires fewer calls to the performance function than other methods and it has high convergence speed, good accuracy and stability. And the method can be used in engineering problems with implicit and high nonlinear performance function. © 2017, Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 151
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Wang D., Zhou L., Sun Z., Et al., Motion reliability analysis of ball screw pair based on Monte Carlo method, Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 8, (2012)
  • [2] Rajashekhar M.R., Ellingwood B.R., A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis, Structural safety, 12, 3, pp. 205-220, (1993)
  • [3] Gayton N., Bourinet J.M., Lemaire M., CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliabilityanalysis, Structural safety, 25, 1, pp. 99-121, (2003)
  • [4] Yan M., Sun Z., Yang Q., Analysis method of reliability sensitivity based on response surface methods, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 43, 10, pp. 67-70, (2007)
  • [5] Alibrandi U., Alani A.M., Ricciardi G., A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 41, pp. 1-12, (2015)
  • [6] Bucher C., Most T., A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 23, 2, pp. 154-163, (2008)
  • [7] Schueremans L., Vangemert D., Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis, Structural safety, 27, 3, pp. 246-261, (2005)
  • [8] Tong C., Sun Z., Yang L., Et al., An active learning reliability method based on Kriging and Monte Carlo, Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, 36, 9, (2015)
  • [9] Zhang Q., Li X., Analysis of structural reliability based on Kriging model, Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2, pp. 175-179, (2006)
  • [10] Gaspar B., Teixeira A.P., Soares C.G., Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 37, pp. 24-34, (2014)