A Prediction Method of Geometric Accuracy for Five-Axis CNC Machine Tools Considering Tool Setting Position

被引：0

作者：

Wu C. ^{[1
]}

Zheng M. ^{[1
]}

Wang Q. ^{[1
]}

Fan J. ^{[2
]}

Song X. ^{[3
]}

Wang L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Henan Key Lab. of Intelligent Manufacturing of Mechanical Equipment, Zhengzhou Univ. of Light Inst., Zhengzhou

[2] Beijing Key Lab. of Advanced Manufacturing Technol., Beijing Univ. of Technol., Beijing

[3] Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou

来源：

Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu/Advanced Engineering Sciences | 2022年 / 54卷 / 04期

关键词：

CNC machine tool; cone frustum; geometric accuracy; prediction model; tool setting position;

D O I：

10.15961/j.jsuese.202100262

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In view of the influence of tool setting position on the accuracy of a machine tool and the evaluation of its final accuracy and performance, a method of geometric accuracy prediction for a five axis CNC machine tool (FACMT) considering tool setting position is proposed. Firstly, the kinematics equation of the FACMT based on a NAS979 inclined cone frustum is established by using multi-body system theory. On this basis, the solving equations for the actual machining position and NC machining instructions of the test piece based on tool setting position are built, the prediction model of geometric accuracy for the FACMT is established and the accuracy indexes such as roundness, angularity and concentricity of the cone frustum are predicted. Then, the simulation prediction for accuracy of the FACMT is carried out. The predicted values of roundness, angularity and concentricity are 0.0251 mm, ϕ 0.057 3 mm and 0.019 2 mm, respectively, while their required standard tolerances are 0.100 mm, ϕ 0.100 mm and 0.030 mm, respectively. The simulation results show that the predicted accuracy indexes of the cone frustum can meet the requirements of standard tolerance accuracy. Finally, in order to verify the effectiveness of the method, the cutting experiment of the test piece of inclined cone frustum is carried out. The maximum values of roundness, angularity and concentricity are 0.038 0 mm, ϕ 0.093 1 mm and 0.028 2 mm, respectively, the minimum values are 0.031 6 mm, ϕ 0.065 8 mm and 0.024 6 mm, respectively, and the measured mean values are 0.035 6 mm, ϕ 0.080 5 mm and 0.027 1 mm, respectively. The experimental results show that the measured mean values are in good agreement with the predicted ones. Therefore, in the process of precision inspection and acceptance of newly developed machine tools, this method can be used to evaluate their accuracy and performance accurately, quickly and intuitively. © 2022 Editorial Department of Journal of Sichuan University. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：173 / 186

页数：13

共 31 条

[1] Tang Yuhang, Research on causes of flank milling errors of five-axis machine tool based on S-shaped test piece, (2018)
[2] Dongju Chen, Lihua Dong, Xue Gao, Et al., Error tracing of the complex CNC machine tools based on “S” shaped workpiece[J], Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52, 21, pp. 155-165, (2016)
[3] Dongju Chen, Hao Wang, Ri Pan, Et al., An accurate characterization method to tracing the geometric defect of the machined surface for complex five-axis machine tools[J], The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 93, pp. 3395-3408, (2017)
[4] Uddin M S, Ibaraki S, Matsubara A, Et al., Prediction and compensation of machining geometric errors of five-axis machining centers with kinematic errors[J], Precision Engineering, 33, 2, pp. 194-201, (2009)
[5] Khan A W, Wuyi Chen, Systematic geometric error modeling for workspace volumetric calibration of a 5-axis turbine blade grinding machine[J], Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 23, 5, pp. 604-615, (2010)
[6] Liu Zhifeng, Liu Guangbo, Cheng Qiang, Et al., Precision modeling and prediction of precise vertical machining center based on theory of multi-body system[J], Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 42, 2, pp. 388-391, (2012)
[7] Shaowei Zhu, Guofu Ding, Shengfeng Qin, Et al., Integrated geometric error modeling,identification and compensation of CNC machine tools[J], International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 52, 1, pp. 24-29, (2012)
[8] Guoda Chen, Yingchun Liang, Yazhou Sun, Et al., Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool[J], The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, pp. 2525-2534, (2013)
[9] Guofu Ding, Shaowei Zhu, Yahya E, Et al., Prediction of machining accuracy based on a geometric error model in five-axis peripheral milling process[J], Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part B:Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 228, 10, pp. 1226-1236, (2014)
[10] Xianlei Liu, Xiaodong Zhang, Fengzhou Fang, Et al., Identification and compensation of main machining errors on surface form accuracy in ultra-precision diamond turning[J], International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 105, pp. 45-57, (2016)

← 1 2 3 4 →