Dynamics simulation and laws of drilling fluid loss in fractured formations

被引:0
|
作者
Wang M. [1 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
Fang M. [1 ]
Zhang S. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, 266580, Shandong
来源
Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica | 2017年 / 38卷 / 05期
关键词
Bingham fluid; Cumulative loss; Drilling fluid loss; Loss rate; Rough fracture;
D O I
10.7623/syxb201705013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well loss is one of the common complex downhole conditions during the drilling in fractured formations. On the basis of fluid dynamics theory, the control equation of fluid loss in 2D rough fractures has been established to basically understand the occurrence mechanism of fluid loss. During the deduction of such equation, drilling fluid is modeled as Bingham fluid and the fracture is described as 2D single fracture with rough surface, index deformation and dip angle. Finite element method is used to solve the fluid loss control equation; based on the created model, the loss laws of drilling fluid in a two-dimension rough fracture has been analyzed. Research results indicate that the smoother the fracture is, the greater the loss rate and the cumulative loss will be; the fracture dip has less impact on loss rate while affects the cumulative loss; the greater the fracture area is, the greater the loss rate and cumulative loss will be; the smaller the fracture length is, the greater the loss rate and cumulative loss will be; the greater the fracture width is, the greater the loss rate and cumulative loss will be; the fluid loss rate and cumulative loss have increased significantly as the downhole pressure difference increases; fluid dynamic shearing stress has less impact on loss rate, but has certain impacts on cumulative loss; the smaller the plastic viscosity is, the greater the loss rate and cumulative loss will be. © 2017, Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 606
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Xu T., Liu Y., Shen W., Drilling Engineering Leakproof Plugging Technology, (1997)
  • [2] Li D., Numerical and experimental investigations of drilling fluid losses in fractured formations, (2012)
  • [3] Wang X., Xiong J., Zhong S., Et al., Loss situation and well loss treatment countermeasures in Northeast, Drilling and Production Technology, 30, 2, pp. 135-137, (2007)
  • [4] Dupriest F.E., Fracture closure stress(FCS) and lost returns practices, (2005)
  • [5] Wang Y., Kang Y., You L., Et al., Progresses in mechanism study and control: mud losses to fractured reservoirs, Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 24, 4, pp. 74-77, (2007)
  • [6] Lu K., Qiu Z., Wei H., Et al., Study on techniques of auto-adapting lost circulation resistance and control for drilling fluid, Acta Petrolei Sinica, 29, 5, pp. 757-760, (2008)
  • [7] Li D., Kang Y., Liu X., Et al., The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms, Acta Petrolei Sinica, 32, 5, pp. 900-904, (2011)
  • [8] Dai Y., Oil-base drilling fluid plugging agent and mechanism research, (2014)
  • [9] Shi X., Xiong J., Chen P., Et al., Study on the lost circulation and sealing mechanism in complex high dip crack formation, Drilling & Production Technology, 30, 5, pp. 24-26, (2007)
  • [10] Sanfillippo F., Brignoli M., Santarelli F.J., Et al., Characterization of conductive fractures while drilling, (1997)