Characteristics of methane flux across the water-air interface in subtropical shallow ponds

被引:5
|
作者
Long L. [1 ]
Xiao S.-B. [1 ]
Zhang C. [2 ,3 ]
Zhang W.-L. [4 ]
Xie H. [4 ]
Li Y.-C. [1 ]
Lei D. [1 ]
Mu X.-H. [1 ]
Zahng J.-W. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang
[2] College of Electrical Engineering & New Energy, China Three Gorges University, Yichang
[3] Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan
[4] College of Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang
来源
Xiao, Shang-Bin (shangbinx@163.com) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 37期
关键词
Bubble emission; Diffusion emission; Flux; Methane; Shallow ponds; The water-air interface;
D O I
10.13227/j.hjkx.201605093
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Five shallow ponds of Yichang were selected to illustrate the characteristics of methane (CH4) in subtropical eutrophic shallow ponds. CH4 flux across the water-air interface was quantified with static floating chamber method for one year. Annual CH4 fluxes of the five ponds were 4.495, 12.702, 6.827, 8.920, 17.560 mg·(m2·h)-1 respectively. Diffusive CH4 fluxes were 0.075, 0.087, 0.118, 0.086, 0.151 mg·(m2·h)-1 respectively and bubble emissions were 4.420, 12.616, 6.709, 8.834, 17.409 mg·(m2·h)-1 respectively. Over 98% of total CH4 flux was bubble emission and CH4 flux was apparently higher than other aquatic ecosystems. So the CH4 flux of shallow waters was high and bubble emission was the dominant way. CH4 emission would be largely underestimated if the research only focus on the diffusion discharge and ignore the bubble emission. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4552 / 4559
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Le Mer J., Roger P., Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review, European Journal of Soil Biology, 37, 1, pp. 25-50, (2001)
  • [2] Delsontro T., McGinnis D.F., Sobek S., Et al., Extreme methane emissions from a swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments, Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 7, pp. 2419-2425, (2010)
  • [3] Rodhe H., A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect, Science, 248, 4960, pp. 1217-1219, (1990)
  • [4] IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2013)
  • [5] Stocker B.D., Roth R., Joos F., Et al., Multiple greenhouse-gas feedbacks from the land biosphere under future climate change scenarios, Nature Climate Change, 3, 7, pp. 666-672, (2013)
  • [6] Downing J.A., Prairie Y.T., Cole J.J., Et al., The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments, Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 5, pp. 2388-2397, (2006)
  • [7] Cao X.P., Zhang G.L., Ma X., Et al., Distribution and air-sea fluxes of methane in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in the spring, Environmental Science, 34, 7, pp. 2565-2573, (2013)
  • [8] Deng H., Cai L.C., Jiang Y.B., Et al., Application of microbial fuel cells in reducing methane emission from rice paddy, Environmental Science, 37, 1, pp. 359-365, (2016)
  • [9] Xie Y., Chen X., Hu Z.H., Et al., Effects of short-time conservation tillage managements on greenhouse gases emissions from soybean-winter wheat rotation system, Environmental Science, 37, 4, pp. 1499-1506, (2016)
  • [10] Guo S.F., Qi Y.C., Yin F.H., Et al., Effect of irrigation patterns on soil CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from winter wheat field in North China plain, Environmental Science, 37, 5, pp. 1880-1890, (2016)