Lift loss of short/vertical takeoff and landing aircraft proximity of ground based on response surface method

被引:0
|
作者
Liu S. [1 ]
Wang Z.-X. [1 ]
Zhou L. [1 ]
Shi J.-W. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源
关键词
Ground effect; Interaction effect; Lift loss; Respond surface; Short/vertical takeoff and landing (S/VTOL);
D O I
10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.04.012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The lift loss flow field calculation model of short/vertical takeoff and landing (S/VTOL) aircraft proximity of the ground was built. The two order response surface function of lift loss about nozzle pressure ratio (NPR), velocity of the cross wind and height of the plane above ground, as well as the key factors affecting the lift loss significantly at multi working states proximity of the ground were obtained by response surface method. The interaction effect of NPR, velocity of the cross wind and height of the plane above ground on the lift loss was analyzed and the minimum lift loss in certain range of working state was optimized. The study shows that the lift loss reduces with the increasing height of the plane above ground and NPR and increases with the velocity of the cross wind when considering single factor; the interaction effect on the lift loss exists between height of the plane above ground and NPR, velocity of the cross wind and NPR, the interaction effect on the lift loss doesn't exist between height of the plane above ground and velocity of the cross wind, the minimum lift loss obtained by optimization is at height of the plane above ground of 9D (D is nozzle diameter), nozzle pressure ratio of 3, velocity of the cross wind of 0 m/s working state, and the corresponding lift loss is 1.3%. © 2017, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 881
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Vanoverbeke T.J., A Numerical Study of the Hot Gas Environment Around a STOVL Aircraft in Ground Proximity, (1988)
  • [2] Johns A.L., Flood J.D., Strock T.W., Et al., Hot Gas Ingestion Testing of an Advanced STOVL Concept in the NASA Lewis 9- by 15-foot Low Speed Wind Tunnel with Flow Visualization, (1988)
  • [3] Johns A.L., Neiner G., Strock T.W., Et al., Engine Inlet Distortion in a 9.2 Percent Scale Vectored Thrust STOVL Model in Ground Effect, (1989)
  • [4] Vanoverbeke T.J., Holdeman J.D., Three-dimensional turbulent flow code calculations of hot gas ingestion, Journal of Aircraft, 27, 7, pp. 577-582, (1990)
  • [5] Fricker D.M., Holdeman J.D., Vanka S.P., Calculations of Hot Gas Ingestion for a STOVL Aircraft Model, (1992)
  • [6] Smith M.S., Chawla K., Vandalsem W.R., Numerical Simulation of a Complete STOVL Aircraft in Ground Effect, (1991)
  • [7] Barata J.M.M., Numerical and Experimental Study of Fountain Flows Produded by Multijet Impingement on a Ground Plane, (1991)
  • [8] Barata J.M.M., Fountain flows produced by multijet impingement on a ground plane, Journal of Aircraft, 30, 1, pp. 50-56, (1993)
  • [9] Karman S.L., CFD Modeling of F-35 Using Hybrid Unstructured Meshes, (2009)
  • [10] Cabrita P.M., Saddington A.J., Knowles K., Unsteady Features of Twin-jet STOVL Ground Effects, (2002)