Cost analysis model for catalytic conversion of syngas in to light hydrocarbon gases

被引:3
|
作者
Deng, Yangyang [1 ]
Parajuli, Prem B. [1 ]
Kim, Hakkwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS,39762, United States
来源
关键词
Cost benefit analysis - Gasification - Biofuels - Economic analysis - Cost accounting - Sensitivity analysis - Spreadsheets;
D O I
10.1016/j.inpa.2015.04.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bio-gasification is a new technology and considered as a more efficient way to utilize bio-energy. The economic feasibility becomes one of the greatest issues when we apply this new technology. Evaluation of economic feasibility of a bio-gasification facility needs better understanding of its production unit cost under different capacities and different working shift modes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the unit cost of biofuel products (Liquid HCs, Light HCs and Oxygenates CxHyOz) under different capacities using a modeling method. The cost analysis model was developed using Visual Basic Microsoft 2008, computer programming language and mathematical equations. The modeling results showed that the unit costs of biofuel product from bio-gasification facility were significantly affected by production capacities of facilities. As the facility capacity increased from 65 to 10,000 N m3 h−1, the biofuel production unit cost of gas (Light HCs), oil (Liquid HCs), and aqueous (Oxygenates CxHyOz) decreased from $38.92 per MMBTU, $30.89 per gallon and $25.74 per gallon to $2.01 per MMBTU, $1.59 per gallon, and $1.33 per gallon, respectively. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that feedstock cost was the most sensitive cost factor on unit costs for all biofuel products at high capacity. The cost analysis model developed in this study could be used to optimize production unit costs of bio-fuel products from bio-gasification facility. © 2015 China Agricultural University
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The processes of hydrocarbon conversion using catalytic systems
    Kuzhaeva, A. A.
    Dzhevaga, N., V
    Berlinskii, I., V
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON APPLIED PHYSICS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND ENGINEERING (APITECH-2019), 2019, 1399
  • [32] Biological conversion of carbon monoxide: rich syngas or waste gases to bioethanol
    Nalakath Abubackar, Haris
    Veiga, Maria C.
    Kennes, Christian
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2011, 5 (01): : 93 - 114
  • [33] CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF WOOD BARKS TO FUEL GASES
    ROSS, RA
    FONG, P
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1981, 20 (01): : 197 - 203
  • [34] NONLINEAR OPTICS AND LIGHT CONVERSION IN GASES
    ARKHIPKIN, VG
    POPOV, AK
    USPEKHI FIZICHESKIKH NAUK, 1987, 153 (03): : 423 - 468
  • [35] Catalytic bi-reforming of methane: from greenhouse gases to syngas
    Kumar, Nitin
    Shojaee, Maryam
    Spivey, J. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 9 : 8 - 15
  • [36] Role of Manganese Oxide in Syngas Conversion to Light Olefins
    Zhu, Yifeng
    Pan, Xiulian
    Jiao, Feng
    Li, Jian
    Yang, Junhao
    Ding, Minzheng
    Han, Yong
    Liu, Zhi
    Bao, Xinhe
    ACS CATALYSIS, 2017, 7 (04): : 2800 - 2804
  • [37] Catalytic performance of titanium subgroup metal oxides for syngas conversion
    Yang S.-C.
    Zhu W.-S.
    Ma S.-Q.
    Xue X.-X.
    Zhang Y.-L.
    Sun Q.
    Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao/Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2022, 50 (05): : 591 - 600
  • [38] An Alternative Synthetic Approach for Efficient Catalytic Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol
    Yue, Hairong
    Ma, Xinbin
    Gong, Jinlong
    ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 47 (05) : 1483 - 1492
  • [39] Shaped Carbons As Supports for the Catalytic Conversion of Syngas to Clean Fuels
    Xiong, Haifeng
    Jewell, Linda L.
    Coville, Neil J.
    ACS CATALYSIS, 2015, 5 (04): : 2640 - 2658
  • [40] Catalytic Conversion of Syngas into Higher Alcohols over Carbide Catalysts
    Christensen, Jakob M.
    Duchstein, Linus D. L.
    Wagner, Jakob B.
    Jensen, Peter A.
    Temel, Burcin
    Jensen, Anker D.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (11) : 4161 - 4172