Cost analysis model for catalytic conversion of syngas in to light hydrocarbon gases

被引:3
|
作者
Deng, Yangyang [1 ]
Parajuli, Prem B. [1 ]
Kim, Hakkwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS,39762, United States
来源
关键词
Cost benefit analysis - Gasification - Biofuels - Economic analysis - Cost accounting - Sensitivity analysis - Spreadsheets;
D O I
10.1016/j.inpa.2015.04.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bio-gasification is a new technology and considered as a more efficient way to utilize bio-energy. The economic feasibility becomes one of the greatest issues when we apply this new technology. Evaluation of economic feasibility of a bio-gasification facility needs better understanding of its production unit cost under different capacities and different working shift modes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the unit cost of biofuel products (Liquid HCs, Light HCs and Oxygenates CxHyOz) under different capacities using a modeling method. The cost analysis model was developed using Visual Basic Microsoft 2008, computer programming language and mathematical equations. The modeling results showed that the unit costs of biofuel product from bio-gasification facility were significantly affected by production capacities of facilities. As the facility capacity increased from 65 to 10,000 N m3 h−1, the biofuel production unit cost of gas (Light HCs), oil (Liquid HCs), and aqueous (Oxygenates CxHyOz) decreased from $38.92 per MMBTU, $30.89 per gallon and $25.74 per gallon to $2.01 per MMBTU, $1.59 per gallon, and $1.33 per gallon, respectively. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that feedstock cost was the most sensitive cost factor on unit costs for all biofuel products at high capacity. The cost analysis model developed in this study could be used to optimize production unit costs of bio-fuel products from bio-gasification facility. © 2015 China Agricultural University
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Catalytic conversion of methane and carbon dioxide (greenhouse gases) into syngas over samarium-cobalt-trioxides perovskite catalyst
    Osazuwa, Osarieme Uyi
    Cheng, Chin Kui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 : 202 - 211
  • [22] Conversion of Liquefied Hydrocarbon Gases on Industrial Nickel Catalysts
    R. E. Yakovenko
    V. B. Il’in
    A. P. Savost’yanov
    I. N. Zubkov
    A. V. Dul’nev
    O. A. Semenov
    Catalysis in Industry, 2020, 12 : 119 - 126
  • [23] Oxidative conversion of hydrocarbon gases in the surface combustion mode
    V. S. Arutyunov
    V. M. Shmelev
    A. N. Rakhmetov
    O. V. Shapovalova
    L. N. Strekova
    A. A. Zakharov
    Russian Chemical Bulletin, 2013, 62 : 1504 - 1509
  • [24] Oxidative conversion of hydrocarbon gases in the surface combustion mode
    Arutyunov, V. S.
    Shmelev, V. M.
    Rakhmetov, A. N.
    Shapovalova, O. V.
    Strekova, L. N.
    Zakharov, A. A.
    RUSSIAN CHEMICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 62 (07) : 1504 - 1509
  • [25] Conversion of Liquefied Hydrocarbon Gases on Industrial Nickel Catalysts
    Yakovenko, R. E.
    Il'in, V. B.
    Savost'yanov, A. P.
    Zubkov, I. N.
    Dul'nev, A. V.
    Semenov, O. A.
    CATALYSIS IN INDUSTRY, 2020, 12 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [26] Simultaneous analysis of hydrocarbon gases
    不详
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2006, 29 (16) : 2551 - 2551
  • [27] REACTOR FOR STEAM CATALYTIC HYDROCARBON CONVERSION AND CATALYTIC CO CONVERSION IN HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION
    ASTRANOVSKY, DL
    ASTANOVSKY, LZ
    RAIKOV, BS
    KORCHAKA, NI
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1994, 19 (08) : 677 - 681
  • [28] Two processes for light hydrocarbon conversion
    Roosen, G.N.
    Salusinszky, A.L.
    CEA : chemical engineering in Australia, 1988, 13 (04): : 10 - 13
  • [29] Catalytic conversion of cellulose into hydrocarbon fuel components
    M. V. Tsodikov
    M. V. Chudakova
    A. V. Chistyakov
    Yu. V. Maksimov
    Petroleum Chemistry, 2013, 53 : 367 - 373
  • [30] Catalytic conversion of cellulose into hydrocarbon fuel components
    Tsodikov, M. V.
    Chudakova, M. V.
    Chistyakov, A. V.
    Maksimov, Yu. V.
    PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY, 2013, 53 (06) : 367 - 373