Influence of spray drying temperature on performance of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for methanol synthesis in slurry reactor

被引:0
|
作者
Li Z. [1 ]
Zhang X. [1 ,2 ]
Guo Q. [1 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi
[2] Taiyuan Coal Gasification(Group) Corporation, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2011年 / 62卷 / 06期
关键词
CuO/ZnO/Al[!sub]2[!/sub]O[!sub]3[!/sub] catalyst; Slurry reactor; Spray drying shaping; Stability;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2011.06.012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The influence of the spray drying temperature on the performance of the CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst used for methanol synthesis is studied in a slurry reactor. The results show that the spray drying temperature lower or higher than 225°C will lead the precursor to water residual or crystallinity degree higher than optimum respectively, which will disadvantage the performance of the catalyst. The performance of the catalyst that spray dried at 225°C is optimal, and its space time yield and deactivation rate reach to 166.7 g·(kg cat) -1·h-1 and 0.16% ·d-1 respectively. The space time yield is equivalent to the catalyst that conventional dried[172.2 g·(kg cat) -1·h-1, 0.43%·d-1], but its stability is improved much. The characterization of the catalysts and precursors indicates that the structure data of the catalyst spray and conventional dried, such as mean diameter of CuO crystallite, specific surface area and hole diameter distribution between 5.8-20 nm, are mainly equivalent with each other. The only difference is that the catalyst particle that spray dried presents homogeneous sphere with mean diameter about 70 μm, while the conventional dried presents irregular shapes with mean diameter about 120 μm. © All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1554 / 1562
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Andrzej, Liquid-phase methanol synthesis, Catalysis Reviews, 36, 4, pp. 557-615, (1994)
  • [2] Ertl G., KnOzinger H., Schuth F., Weitkamp J., Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, pp. 2920-2949, (2008)
  • [3] Song W., Xiao R., Fang D., Methanol Production Technology, (1990)
  • [4] Wender I., Reactions of synthesis gas, Fuel Processing Technology, 48, 3, pp. 189-297, (1996)
  • [5] Lee S., Methanol Synthesis Technology, (1990)
  • [6] Studer D.W., Henderson J.L., Hsing T.H., Status report on the liquid-phase methanol project, The 14th Annual EPRI Contractor's Conference on Fuel Science, (1987)
  • [7] Zhai X., Shamoto J., Xie H., Et al., Study on the deactivation phenomena of Cu-based catalyst for methanol synthesis in slurry phase, Fuel, 87, 4-5, pp. 430-434, (2008)
  • [8] Zhai X., Jun S., Xie H., Tan Y., Han Y., Tsubaki N., Deactivation mechanism of Cu-based catalyst for methanol synthesis in slurry phase, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 28, 1, pp. 51-56, (2007)
  • [9] Diao X., Zhang J., Li G., Gao H., The three-phase slurry-bed technology for synthesis of methanol by the liquid-phase process, Science & Technology in Chemical Industry(China), 8, 6, pp. 49-52, (2000)
  • [10] Chen M., Ying W., Fang D., Zhu B., Global kinetics of methanol synthesis in three-phase slurry reactor, Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 22, 4, pp. 380-385, (1994)