4D trajectory prediction and uncertainty analysis for departure aircraft

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang J. [1 ]
Ge T. [1 ]
Chen Q. [1 ]
Wang F. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
关键词
Air traffic control; Prediction error; Takeoff; Trajectory prediction;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.027
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to accelerate the implementation of trajectory-based operation (TBO), a new four-dimensional (4D) aircraft trajectory prediction approach that is based on aircraft continuous dynamics and discrete dynamics model was presented to predict trajectories of departure aircraft by dividing the departure operation into taking-off and climbing phases. Through in-depth analysis of factors such as the model construction, aircraft intent, initial state, performance parameters, and environmental information, the uncertainty in 4D aircraft trajectory prediction was reduced and the accuracy of prediction was improved. Taking the domestic flight CQH8867 from ZSPD to ZUCK as an example, a simulation was conducted to verify the validity of the proposed method, in which the position error and time error were chosen as the evaluation criteria, and the influences of the takeoff mass, top-of-climb (TOC) altitude, wind speed and wind direction on the departure aircraft 4D trajectory prediction were taken into account. Results show that the proposed algorithm can control the error between expected and actual time of arrival at departure fix within 1 min to meet the demand for air traffic management. © 2016, Editorial Department of Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 806
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Kaneshige J., Benabides J., Sharma S., Et al., Implementation of a trajectory prediction function for trajectory based operations, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, pp. 1-14, (2014)
  • [2] Schuster W., Ochieng W., Performance requirements of future trajectory prediction and conflict detection and resolution tools within SESAR and NextGen, Journal of Air Transport Management, 35, pp. 92-101, (2014)
  • [3] Hancerliogullari G., Rabadi G., Al-Salem A.H., Et al., Greedy algorithms and meta-heuristics for a multiple runway combined arrival-departure aircraft sequencing problem, Journal of Air Transport Management, 32, pp. 39-48, (2013)
  • [4] Zuiga C.A., Piera M.A., Ruiz S., A CD and CR causal model based on path shortening and path stretching techniques, Transportation Research, Part C, 33, pp. 238-256, (2013)
  • [5] Vivona R.A., Cate K.T., Green S.M., Comparison of aircraft trajectory predictor capabilities and impacts on automation interoperability, AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations, pp. 1-21, (2011)
  • [6] Yepes J.L., Hwang I., Rotea M., New algorithms for aircraft intent inference and trajectory prediction, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 30, 2, pp. 370-382, (2007)
  • [7] Hwang I., Seah C.E., Intent-based probabilistic conflict detection for the next generation air transportation system, Proceedings of the IEEE, 96, 12, pp. 2040-2059, (2008)
  • [8] Hwang I., Liu W.Y., Probabilistic trajectory prediction and conflict detection for air traffic control, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 34, 6, pp. 1779-1789, (2011)
  • [9] Zhang J., Sui D., Tang X., Aircraft trajectory prediction based on SDTHE, System Engineering: Theory and Practice, 34, 11, pp. 2955-2964, (2014)
  • [10] Common Trajectory Prediction Structure and Terminology in Support of SESAR and NextGen, (2010)