Experimental study on small-strain shear modulus of sand-silt mixtures by bender element testing

被引:1
|
作者
Wu Q. [1 ]
Yang W. [1 ]
Zhu Y. [1 ]
Zhao K. [1 ]
Chen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing
关键词
Fine content; Modified Hardin model; Sand-silt mixtures; Small-strain shear modulus;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.06.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to investigate the influences of the fine content f c , relative density D r , and initial effective confining pressure σ' 3c on the small-strain shear modulus G max of sand-silt mixtures, a series of bender element tests were performed on saturated sand-silt mixtures with various f c , D r and σ' 3c . The test results show that, as f c increases, G max of the mixtures with D r = 35% or 50% first decreases and then increases slightly, while G max for D r = 60% case presents a decreasing tendency. σ' 3c causes an increase in G max with different f c at a given D r , and the growth rate of G max with σ' 3c remains basically unchanged. In addition, G max decreases with the increase of the void ratio at a fixed σ' 3c , and f c has a strong influence on the decreasing rate of G max at a constant σ' 3c . The testing results reveal that G max for a specified f c case can be estimated reasonably using the Hardin model. However, as f c increases, the best-fitting parameter A of the Hardin model first decreases and then increases. The modified Hardin model, considering the influences of f c , σ' 3c and e, can be used to predict G max for different types of sand-silt mixtures, and the errors of the predicted G max are basically less than 10%. © 2018, Editorial Department of Journal of Southeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1067
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Yang J., Yan X.R., Site response to multi-directional earthquake loading: A practical procedure, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 4, pp. 710-721, (2009)
  • [2] Andrus R.D., Stokoe K.H., Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126, 11, pp. 1015-1025, (2000)
  • [3] Kong M., Chen G., Li X., Et al., Shear wave velocity and peak ground acceleration based deterministic and probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 36, 5, (2015)
  • [4] Clayton C.R.I., Stiffness at small strain: Research and practice, Géotechnique, 61, 1, pp. 5-37, (2011)
  • [5] Hardin B.O., Black W.L., Sand stiffness under various triaxial stresses, Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Division, 92, 2, pp. 27-42, (1966)
  • [6] McDowell G.R., Bolton M.D., Micro mechanics of elastic soil, Soils and Foundations, 41, 6, pp. 147-152, (2001)
  • [7] Drnevich V.P., Resonant-column testing-problems and solutions, Dynamic Geotechnical Testing, pp. 384-398, (1978)
  • [8] Ishihara K., Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics, pp. 85-107, (1996)
  • [9] Taiebat M., Dafalias Y.F., SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 32, 8, pp. 915-948, (2008)
  • [10] Goudarzy M., Rahemi N., Rahman M.M., Et al., Predicting the maximum shear modulus of sands containing nonplastic fines, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143, 9, (2017)