Peer effects in corporate cash dividends policy

被引:0
|
作者
Wang L. [1 ]
Zhang P. [1 ]
Zhang S. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Finance, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai
[2] School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cash dividends policy; Peers effects; Semi-mandatory dividends rules;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2019-1154
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using A-share listed companies as a sample, this paper investigates peer effects in corporate cash dividends policy from the perspectives of propensity and amount of dividend payments. We find robust evidence that firm's cash dividend payment propensity is significantly influenced by the policies of their industry peers. Moreover, peer influence on cash dividend payment is more pronounced among high-growth and low-cash flow firms. Meanwhile, we find little evidence about peer effects in dividend payments amount. These results indicate that under the background of semi-mandatory dividends rules, firms with high growth and low cash flow have to consider their peers' dividend policy and respond properly to obtain refinancing qualifications. However, what firms focus on is not their peers' payout amount but their propensity to pay dividends. Further research shows that information learning, industry rivalry and CEO reputation concerns are main driving factors of peer effects of corporate cash dividends policy. This paper helps us get better understanding of corporate payout policy in special institutional background and enriches corporate peer effects research. © 2021, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Li C Q, Wei Z H, Wu S N., A study on market reactions to the Semi-mandatory dividend policy, Economic Research Journal, 45, 3, pp. 144-155, (2010)
  • [2] Leary M T, Roberts M R., Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy?, Journal of Finance, 69, 1, pp. 139-178, (2014)
  • [3] Kaustia M, Rantala V., Social learning and corporate peer effects, Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 3, pp. 653-669, (2015)
  • [4] Wan L Y, Liang C J, Rao J., Industry peer effect in M&A decisions of China's listed companies, Nankai Business Review, 19, 3, pp. 40-50, (2016)
  • [5] Zhong T L, Zhang T Y., Peer Effects" in capital structure decision of Chinese firms: Empirical investigation based on Chinese A-Share listed firms, Nankai Business Review, 20, 2, pp. 58-70, (2017)
  • [6] Graham J R, Kumar A., Do dividend clienteles exist?Evidence on dividend preferences of retail investors, Journal of Finance, 61, 3, pp. 1305-1336, (2006)
  • [7] Jensen M C, Meckling W H., Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 4, pp. 305-360, (1976)
  • [8] Ma P F, Dong Z, Zhang X., Research on threshold effects of dividend agency theory based on internal control, Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 39, 8, pp. 1966-1975, (2019)
  • [9] Miller M H, Rock K., Dividend policy under asymmetric information, The Journal of Finance, 40, 4, pp. 1031-1051, (1985)
  • [10] Zhang C, Lu W., Information environment, financing constraints and cash dividends, Journal of Financial Research, 7, pp. 81-94, (2009)