Can reusable packaging revolutionise e-commerce? Unveiling the environmental impact through a comparative carbon footprint analysis

被引:0
|
作者
González Romero, Iria [1 ]
Buldeo Rai, Heleen [2 ]
Ortiz Bas, Ángel [3 ]
Prado Prado, J. Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Universidade de Vigo, Grupo de Ingeniería de Organización (GIO), Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, Vigo,36310, Spain
[2] Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Research Group Mobilise, Brussels,1050, Belgium
[3] Centre in Production Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Valencia, Spain
关键词
Carbon footprint - Cardboard;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143738
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
E-commerce is a rapidly growing, evolving sector. Its environmental impact has also increased, with shipping packaging being a key contributor. The sector is, however, struggling to tackle this environmental impact, as well as to follow new packaging regulations. Previous studies on reusable packaging have predominantly been qualitative or concentrated on material selection, overlooking essential elements of supply chain design and consumer behaviour. Industry reports attempting to quantify the sustainability of reusable packaging have produced varied results that lack generalisability or transferability to other contexts. Consequently, it is difficult to determine the actual environmental sustainability of reusable packaging in e-commerce. In this research, we assess the carbon footprint of reusable packaging in e-commerce, through a comparison of eight case studies. A multiple case study approach is followed, employing an embedded design where more than one unit of analysis is explored in each case. We evaluate the CO2 emissions of all processes related to the circular supply chain of reusable packaging employing a method that can evaluate different solutions and situations and a sensitivity analysis. Findings highlight three specific factors influencing the carbon footprint of reusable packaging: (1) reusable packaging material, (2) return and reuse rate, and (3) supply chain design (i.e., centralised versus decentralised design, travel distance, transport mode). For the same type of reusable packaging, we found that polyester generates 215% more CO2 emissions than cardboard in production and waste management. However, by analysing the same reusable packaging and supply chain, these same emissions can drastically increase if the return and reuse rate decreases. Changes in the return and reuse rate mainly linked, among others, to customer behaviour and involvement. Furthermore, for the same reusable packaging and return and reuse rate, a decentralised supply chain can reduce the CO2 emissions compared to a centralised structure. Interestingly, reusable packaging is environmentally sustainable long before it reaches its maximum life cycle. Most of the analysed solutions were more environmentally friendly than a cardboard box when they reached 10% of their estimated life cycle. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Reusable packaging adoption in e-commerce markets with green consumers: An evolutionary game analysis
    Yue, Ruiting
    Xu, Xianhao
    Li, Zhiwen
    Bai, Qingguo
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2024, 81
  • [2] Comparative Carbon Footprint Assessment of Cross-Border E-Commerce Shipping Options
    Cheah, Lynette
    Huang, Qiuhong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (01) : 584 - 595
  • [3] CARBON FOOTPRINT IMPACT OF HOLIDAY e-COMMERCE: A CASE STUDY OF SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
    Shaik, Salma
    Kuruppuarachchi, Lakshika Nishadhi
    Franchetti, Matthew John
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 21 (04): : 687 - 698
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF THE TYPES AND EFFECTS OF POSSIBLE ERRORS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ECOLOGICAL REUSABLE PACKAGING INTO E-COMMERCE USING FMEA
    Tokarski, Daniel
    Motowidlak, Urszula
    EKONOMIA I SRODOWISKO-ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 85 (02): : 221 - 235
  • [5] Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes
    Davis, Niall F.
    McGrath, Shannon
    Quinlan, Mark
    Jack, Gregory
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Bolton, Damien M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (03) : 214 - 217
  • [6] Comparative energy, environmental, and economic analysis of traditional and e-commerce DVD rental networks
    Sivaraman, Deepak
    Pacca, Sergio
    Mueller, Kimberly
    Lin, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 11 (03) : 77 - 91
  • [7] Single-use vs. reusable packaging in e-commerce: comparing carbon footprints and identifying break-even points
    Zimmermann, Till
    Bliklen, Rebecca
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2020, 29 (03): : 176 - 183
  • [8] Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris® Single-Use Cystoscope and Reusable Flexible Cystoscope and a Systematic Review of Literature
    Jahrreiss, Victoria
    Sarrot, Pierre
    Davis, Niall F.
    Somani, Bhaskar
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (04) : 386 - 394
  • [9] Environmental Impact of Last Mile Deliveries and Returns in Fashion E-Commerce: A Cross-Case Analysis of Six Retailers
    Velazquez, R.
    Chankov, S. M.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 1099 - 1103
  • [10] Exploring online advocacy mechanisms through self-presentation: a comparative analysis between e-commerce website customers
    Shaukat, Haroon
    Elgammal, Islam
    Khan, Mukaram Ali
    Selem, Kareem M.
    MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2024,