Experimental study on seismic behavior of steel reinforced ultra-high strength concrete column-steel reinforced normal-strength concrete beam composite frame

被引:0
|
作者
Jia J. [1 ]
Zhang J. [1 ]
Guo Z. [2 ]
Zhou H. [3 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian
[2] College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen
[3] Shanghai Construction Group Engineering Research General Institute, Shanghai
来源
Zhang, Jiancheng (zjc15951087073@126.com) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 37期
关键词
Composite frame; Low reversed cyclic loading test; Seismic performance; SRNSC frame; SRUHSC column;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2016.12.012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate the seismic behavior of steel reinforced ultra-high strength concrete (SRUHSC) column-steel reinforced normal-strength concrete (SRNSC) beam composite frame, two one-fourth scale two-span, three-story frame specimens were designed and constructed, and one of them is SRNSC frame. Low reversed cyclic loading tests were conducted on two frame specimens. The failure process and modes were described, meanwhile the hysteretic curves, skeleton curves, bearing capacity, displacement ductility, energy dissipation capacity, stiffness, and strength degradation were compared and analyzed. The research results show that the failure patterns of SRUHSC frame is similar to the SRNSC frame. When the experimental axial loading ratio is 0.38, the beam hinge failure mechanism is achieved for the two frames, and the hysteretic curves are plump. Moreover, the displacement ductility coefficients of two frames are all more than 3.0, which shows that the specimens have excellent seismic behavior with sufficient ductility. However, in terms of bearing capacity, displacement ductility, energy dissipation capacity, strength and stiffness degeneration, etc., SRUHSC column-SRNSC beam composite frame is totally better than the SRNSC frame, which indicates that encasing structural steel and high-strength stirrups into the ultra-high strength concrete is a good way for alleviating the problem of brittleness and improving structural carrying capacity by significantly making use of the compressive high strength property and enhancing the structural ductility. Therefore, the seismic performance of the SRUHSC column-SRNSC beam composite frame structure system is effectively improved. © 2016, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Jia J., Jiang R., Hou T., An experimental study on seismic performance of steel reinforced super high-strength concrete columns, China Civil Engineering Journal, 39, 8, pp. 14-18, (2006)
  • [2] Jia J., Zhao G., Mechanics Performance of Steel Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Short Columns, pp. 1-16, (2006)
  • [3] EN 1994-1-1 Eurocode 4:design of composite steel and concrete structures: part 1. 1: general rules and rules for buildings, (1992)
  • [4] AISC, Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings, (1993)
  • [5] Leon R.T., Hajjar J.F., Gustafson M.A., Seismic response of composite moment-resisting connections: I: performance, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 124, 8, pp. 868-876, (1998)
  • [6] Michael N.B., Joseph M.B., Walter P.M., Seismic behavior of composite RCS frame systems, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126, 4, pp. 429-436, (2000)
  • [7] Masayoshi N.M., Tomohiro M., Keiichiro S., Full-scale test of composite frame under large cyclic loading, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133, 2, pp. 297-304, (2007)
  • [8] Zhu W., Jia J., Experimental study on seismic behaviors of steel reinforced high strength concrete columns, Journal of Building Structures, 36, 4, pp. 57-67, (2015)
  • [9] Jia J., Zhu W., Yu F., Et al., Curvature ductility of steel-reinforced ultra-high-strength concrete column sections, China Civil Engineering Journal, 46, 1, pp. 42-51, (2013)
  • [10] Zhu W., Meng G., Jia J., Experimental studies on axial load performance of high-strength concrete short columns, Proceedings of the ICE-Structures and Buildings, 167, 9, pp. 509-519, (2013)