Multi-stage green supplier selection for complex product system considering synergetic effect

被引：0

作者：

Guo J. ^{[1
,2
]}

Zhu W. ^{[1
,2
]}

Du B. ^{[1
,2
]}

Li Y. ^{[1
,2
]}

Wang L. ^{[1
,2
]}

Guo S. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan

[2] Hubei Provincial Digital Manufacturing Key Laboratory, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan

来源：

Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS | 2020年 / 26卷 / 09期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Complex product system; Green supplier selection; Intuitionistic fuzzy set; Multi-stage; Synergy effect;

D O I：

10.13196/j.cims.2020.09.026

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Green supplier selection plays an important role in the long lifecycle of Complex Product System (CoPS). Considering the requirements of core enterprises for green supplier selection in CoPS's lifecycle, the index system of CoPS's green supplier selection was established, which included economic index, social index and green index. Considering the interaction between suppliers with different functions in different stages or different sub-functions in a stage, an improved CoPS Multi-stage Green Supplier Selection (MGSS&CoPS) model was proposed, which could make single-stage evaluation based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFSs) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution(TOPSIS). Meanwhile, the definition of compatibility among suppliers was proposed to reduce alternative supplier combination. The optimal CoPS multi-stage supplier combination selection was realized by combining MGSS&CoPS with single-stage supplier evaluation and multi-stage supplier compatibility. An example of green supplier selection for a cement equipment manufacturing enterprise was given to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method. © 2020, Editorial Department of CIMS. All right reserved.

引用

页码：2573 / 2589

页数：16

共 35 条

[1] HOBDAY M., The project-based organisation:An ideal form for managing complex products and systems [J], Research Policy, 29, 7, pp. 871-893, (2000)
[2] MAJIDPOUR M., Technological catch-up in complex product systems, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, pp. 92-105, (2016)
[3] DEDEHAYIR O, NOKELAINEN T, MAKINEN S J., Disruptive innovations in complex product systems industries: A case study, Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 33, C, pp. 174-192, (2014)
[4] DU B, GUO S, HUANG X, Et al., A Pareto supplier selection algorithm for minimum the life cycle cost of complex product system[J], Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 9, pp. 4253-4264, (2015)
[5] SHEIKHALISHAHI M, TORABI S A., Maintenance supplier selection considering life cycle costs and risks:A fuzzy goal programming approach, International Journal of Production Research, 52, 23, pp. 7084-7099, (2014)
[6] ZHANG Di, SUN Tao, GAO Mingmei, Et al., Multi-stage two-sided matching method for main manufacturer and suppliers of complex products with multi-form preference ordinal, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 24, 3, pp. 804-812, (2018)
[7] DICKSON G W., An analysis of vendor selection systems and decision[J], Journal of Purchasing, 2, 1, pp. 5-17, (1966)
[8] WEBER C A, CURRENT J R, BENTON W C., Vendor selection criteria and methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 1, pp. 2-18, (1991)
[9] Qin Jindong, LIU Xinwang, PEDRYCZ W., An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment, European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 2, pp. 626-638, (2016)
[10] LEE A H I, KANG H Y, HSU C F, Et al., A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry[J], Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4, pp. 7917-7927, (2009)

← 1 2 3 4 →