The mechanism and improvement path of rural perceived resilience from the perspective of farmers: A case study of Qufu city, Shandong province

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang Y. [1 ]
Lyu X. [1 ]
Zhang X. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Humanities and Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Shandong, Rizhao
来源：
Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica | 2024年 / 79卷 / 02期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
farmers' satisfaction; pressure-state-perception-behavior-response; Qufu city; rural perceived resilience; rural resilience;
D O I：
10.11821/dlxb202402003
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Improving rural sustainable development capability from the perspective of perceived resilience is crucial to comprehensively promote rural revitalization. Based on the theoretical connotation of rural perceived resilience, this paper discusses the operational logic of rural perceived resilience from the level of "pressure-state-perception-behavior-response", and constructs an indicator system from the perspective of "state-perception" and "behavior-response" based on the data of farmers' questionnaires in 12 villages in 3 towns, Qufu city, Shandong province in 2020. While evaluating the rural perceived resilience, we use the structural equation model to demonstrate the mechanism of rural perceived resilience. The results show that: (1) Rural perceived resilience refers to the ability of rural system to use rural resources to predict, absorb and adapt to rural change, and promote the restructuring of rural elements and the transformation of production and lifestyle, depending on its level of resource elements; (2) The diversified response of social networks and the state of production and construction have become the main components of rural perceived resilience, while the response path of livelihood diversification and material capital enrichment has not been fully formed; (3) Whether the way the rural system responds to the pressure can promote the transformation of traditional villages to modernization depends on the farmers' perception and behavioral decision-making. The better the farmers' perception of the rural state, the more inclined they are to actively use resources to promote the restructuring of rural elements, and fundamentally realize the transformation and development of villages; (4) We should improve the rural perceived resilience by optimizing spatial governance, promoting the transformation from "state-perception" to "behavior-response", and accurately regulating rural "pressure". © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：321 / 336
页数：15
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Wood R E., Survival of Rural America: Small Victories and Bitter Harvests, (2008)
  • [2] Markey S, Halseth G, Manson D., Challenging the inevitability of rural decline: Advancing the policy of place in northern British Columbia, Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 4, pp. 409-421, (2008)
  • [3] Liu Y S, Li Y H., Revitalize the world's countryside, Nature, 548, 7667, pp. 275-277, (2017)
  • [4] Schwarz A M, Bene C, Bennett G, Et al., Vulnerability and resilience of remote rural communities to shocks and global changes: Empirical analysis from Solomon Islands, Global Environmental Change, 21, 3, pp. 1128-1140, (2011)
  • [5] Li Y H, Westlund H, Zheng X Y, Et al., Bottom-up initiatives and revival in the face of rural decline: Case studies from China and Sweden, Journal of Rural Studies, 47, pp. 506-513, (2016)
  • [6] MacDonald D, Crabtree J R, Wiesinger G, Et al., Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response, Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 1, pp. 47-69, (2000)
  • [7] Johnson K M, Lichter D T., Rural depopulation: Growth and decline processes over the past century, Rural Sociology, 84, 1, pp. 3-27, (2019)
  • [8] Syssner J., Pathways to Demographic Adaptation: Perspectives on Policy and Planning in Depopulating Areas in Northern Europe, (2020)
  • [9] Gunderson L H, Holling C S., Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, (2002)
  • [10] Walker B H, Salt D., Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, (2006)
12345