A two-step inversion method for micro-seismic source location

被引：0
|
作者：
Li S. [1 ]
Wu L. [1 ]
Yang J. [1 ]
Wang S. [1 ]
机构：
[1] State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, 610059, Sichuan
来源：
Wu, Lizhou (wulizhou07@cdut.cn) | 1710年 / Academia Sinica卷 / 36期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Combination method; Inversion method; Micro-seismic source location; Mining engineering; Multi-objective optimization; Velocity model;
D O I：
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1515
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Micro-seismic source location is crucial for the micro-seismic monitoring technology. The existing algorithms usually minimize the function of time arrival values(time difference) from all detectors to obtain the location of micro-seismic source. The positioning results deviate usually from the actual locations of the sources because all the known micro-seismic parameters have errors. To overcome the shortcomings of the present algorithm, a two-step inversion method for the micro-seismic source location is thus proposed. The first inversion is to identify the abnormal detector, and the second inversion is to search the exact location from the space coordinates of sources. The 3-parameter, 4-parameter and 5-parameter inversion models on the assumption of uniform velocity are established and compared. A multi-objective genetic algorithm(Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II, NSGA-II) is used for the first inversion. A single objective optimization algorithm is suggested in the second inversion in order to achieve the accurate source searching and to reduce the computing time. The results from a case study indicate that the proposed method can effectively identify the abnormal detectors and the positioning is greatly improved compared with the results with the abnormal geophone. The 4-parameter inversion model is better than the 5-parameter inversion model. © 2017, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1710 / 1717
页数：7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Xu N., Li T., Dai F., Et al., Stability analysis on surrounding rock mass in underground caverns based on discrete element simulation and microseismic monitoring, Journal of Sichuan University:Engineering Science, 48, 5, pp. 1-8, (2016)
  • [2] Xu N.W., Li T.B., Dai F., Et al., Microseismic monitoring and stability evaluation for the large scale underground caverns at the Houziyan hydropower station in Southwest China, Engineering Geology, 188, pp. 48-67, (2015)
  • [3] Ma T., Tang C., Tang L., Et al., Mechanism of rock burst forecasting based on micro-seismic monitoring technology, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 35, 3, pp. 470-483, (2016)
  • [4] Li N., Wang E., Sun Z., Et al., Simplex microseismic source location method based on L1norm statistical standard, Journal of China Coal Society, 39, 12, pp. 2431-2438, (2014)
  • [5] Geiger L., Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only, 8, pp. 60-71, (1912)
  • [6] Douglas A., Joint epicenter determination, Nature, 215, pp. 45-48, (1976)
  • [7] Spence W., Relative epicenter determination using P-wave arrival-time differences, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of American, 70, 1, pp. 171-183, (1980)
  • [8] Li X.B., Dong L.J., Comparison of two methods in acoustic emission source location using four sensors without measuring sonic speed, Sensor Letters, 9, 5, pp. 1501-1505, (2011)
  • [9] Dong L., Li X., Tang L., Et al., Mathematical functions and parameters for microseismic source location without pre-measuring speed, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 30, 10, pp. 2057-2067, (2011)
  • [10] Li J., Gao Y., Xie Y., Et al., Improvement of microseism locating based on simplex method without velocity measuring, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 33, 7, pp. 1336-1346, (2014)
123