Quasi-steady response and LLTR control of a wind turbine blade with bending-torsion coupled

被引:0
|
作者
Liu T. [1 ]
Chang L. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Mechanical & Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Science & Technology, Qingdao
来源
关键词
Bending-torsion coupled; Circumferential asymmetric stiffness; Flutter suppression; Hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform; LLTR control; Quasi-steady response;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2018.13.019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quasi-steady responses of a wind turbine blade and its theoretical control process based on LQG with loop transfer recovery (LLTR) were studied to solve divergent instability of a composite thin-walled blade with bending-torsion coupled. The blade structure was modeled as a thin-walled single closed chamber airfoil based on laminated composite with circumferential asymmetric stiffness. The middle-line trajectory of the airfoil was the S809Ⅱairfoil type line. A quasi-steady aerodynamic model was extracted from stall aerodynamic models of helicopter blade, and after modified it was suitable for studying critical states of classical flutter and stall flutter of wind turbine blade. The LLTR control in two cases of input loop-based transfer recovery and output loop-based transfer recovery was investigated in detail. Through comparing the blade's bending-torsion coupled responses with simulated controller responses and singular value Bode diagram, the stability of the LLTR control algorithm and its superiority in flutter suppression were verified. The real-time effects of the LLTR control algorithm were also examined with a hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform. © 2018, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Ke S., Yu W., Wang T., Wind-included vibration responses analysis for a large wind turbine blade-tower system based on large eddy simulation, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36, 7, pp. 92-98, (2017)
  • [2] Baran R.P., Aeroelastic analysis and classical flutter of a wind turbine using BLADEMODE V. 2.0 and PHATAS in FOCUS 6, (2013)
  • [3] Laxman V., Venkatesan C., Chaotic response of an airfoil due to aeroelastic coupling and dynamic stall, AIAA Journal, 45, 1, pp. 271-280, (2007)
  • [4] Shete C.D., Chandiramani N.K., Librescu L., Optimal control of a pretwisted shearable smart composite rotating beam, Acta Mechanica, 191, 1-2, pp. 37-58, (2007)
  • [5] Song Z.G., Li F.M., Aerothermoelastic analysis and active flutter control of supersonic composite laminated cylindrical shells, Composite Structures, 106, 12, pp. 653-660, (2013)
  • [6] Labane C., Zemalache M.K., Aircraft control system using LQG and LQR controller with optimal estimation-Kalman filter design, Procedia Engineering, 80, pp. 245-257, (2014)
  • [7] Rene B.C., Marta M., Optimal LQG controller for variable speed wind turbine based on genetic algorithms, Energy Procedia, 20, pp. 207-216, (2012)
  • [8] Alena K., Maria H., LQG/LTR based reference tracking for a modular servo, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2, 3, pp. 347-357, (2015)
  • [9] Greenberg M.J., Airfoil in Sinusoidal Motion in a Pulsating Stream, (1947)
  • [10] Wang X., Chen J., Shen W., Et al., Integration study on airfoil profile for wind turbines, China Mechanical Engineering, 20, 2, pp. 211-213, (2010)