Adaptive stochastic resonance detection of weak light signal in underwater laser communication

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang J. [1 ]
Lan X. [1 ]
Yang Y. [1 ]
He F. [1 ]
Zhu Y. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Electronic Engineering, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an
[2] Xi'an Precision Machinery Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an
[3] Science and Technology on Underwater Information and Control Laboratory, Xi'an
关键词
Ant colony algorithm; Low signal-to-noise ratio; Stochastic resonance; Underwater optical wireless communication;
D O I
10.37188/OPE.20223012.1383
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) systems, the low signal-to-noise ratio causes received optical signals to be submerged in strong noise. To solve this problem, a detection method for underwater weak optical signals based on adaptive stochastic resonance (ASR) is proposed. In this study, the characteristics of underwater weak light signals and the detection mechanism of stochastic resonance are analyzed. The concept of twice sampling is introduced to enable the application of stochastic resonance to optical signal detection at any frequency. Additionally, the parameters that affected the stochastic resonance system are evaluated, and a detection method combining the improved ant colony algorithm and stochastic resonance is proposed. The system dynamically adjusts the system parameters based on the detection performance, such that the entire system achieves the optimal matching state to realize ASR. To verify the effectiveness of the method, a UOWC experimental system based on an avalanche photodiode is built. The experimental results show that the bit error rate is 5×10-4 when SNR=-4.559 5 dB. Thus, underwater weak light signal detection based on ASR is proved to significantly improve the bit error rate performance of UOWC receivers. © 2022, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1393
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] ZOU C, YANG F., Autoencoder based underwater wireless optical communication with high data rate, Optics Letters, 46, 6, pp. 1446-1449, (2021)
  • [2] XU J., Underwater wireless optical communication: why, what, and how?, Chinese Optics Letters, 17, 10, (2019)
  • [3] KAUSHAL H, KADDOUM G., Underwater optical wireless communication, IEEE Access, 4, pp. 1518-1547, (2016)
  • [4] GHASSEMLOOY Z, ARNON S, UYSAL M, Et al., Emerging optical wireless communications-advances and challenges, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33, 9, pp. 1738-1749, (2015)
  • [5] CAO W X, SUN Z H, LI C, Et al., In situ measurement of phytoplankton size class, Opt. Precision Eng, 26, 4, pp. 764-770, (2018)
  • [6] YANG Y, HE F T, GUO Q P, Et al., Analysis of underwater wireless optical communication system performance, Applied Optics, 58, 36, pp. 9808-9814, (2019)
  • [7] SHEN J N, WANG J L, CHEN X, Et al., Towards power-efficient long-reach underwater wireless optical communication using a multi-pixel photon counter, Optics Express, 26, 18, pp. 23565-23571, (2018)
  • [8] WANG J L, YANG X Q, LV W C, Et al., Underwater wireless optical communication based on multi-pixel photon counter and OFDM modulation, Optics Communications, 451, pp. 181-185, (2019)
  • [9] HU S Q, MI L, ZHOU T H, Et al., 35.88 attenuation lengths and 3.32 bits/photon underwater optical wireless communication based on photon-counting receiver with 256-PPM, Optics Express, 26, 17, pp. 21685-21699, (2018)
  • [10] CHEN X, YANG X Q, TONG Z J, Et al., 150 m/500 mbps underwater wireless optical communication enabled by sensitive detection and the combination of receiver-side partial response shaping and TCM technology, Journal of Lightwave Technology, 39, 14, pp. 4614-4621, (2021)