Antiseismic performance of the world's first high-speed railway suspension bridge

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao K. [1 ]
Wang H. [1 ]
Gao H. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
关键词
ANSYS; Bridge engineering; Central buckle; High-speed railway suspension bridge; Seismic response; Traveling wave effect;
D O I
10.11990/jheu.202006051
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To assess the performance of long-span suspension bridges in high-speed railway lines, their responses to complex loads must be determined. Thus, the Wufengshan Yangtze River Bridge (WYRB), which is the world's first high-speed railway suspension bridge, is the research object herein. Based on the software ANSYS, the seismic response of the WYRB to different apparent wave velocity effects is calculated under the influence of the central buckle. Results show that different forms of the central buckle are conducive to controlling the reciprocating displacement between the seismic input lower cable and girder, which effectively protects the mid-span suspenders. However, the displacement response at the end of the girder is closely related to the apparent wave velocity. The smallest peak displacement is detected when the rigid central buckle is set under a low apparent wave velocity. The peak displacement increases with the increase of the apparent wave velocity, and the main part of the displacement response is the high-frequency component, which is unfavorable to the overall structure. The rigid central buckle has only a slight influence on the peak internal force response at the bottom of the tower. However, the high-frequency components are reduced. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of HEU. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1262 / 1270
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] LI Xiaozhen, QIN Yu, LIU Dejun, The safety control of train running on the Wufeng Mountain Yangtze River Bridge under crosswind, Journal of railway engineering society, 35, 7, pp. 58-64, (2018)
  • [2] ZHENG Shixiong, SHI Xinhu, JIA Hongyu, Et al., Seismic response analysis of long-span and asymmetrical suspension bridges subjected to near-fault ground motion, Engineering failure analysis, 115, (2020)
  • [3] SIRINGORINGO D M, FUJINO Y., Seismic response of a suspension bridge: insights from long-term full-scale seismic monitoring system, Structural control and health monitoring, 25, 11, (2018)
  • [4] APAYDIN N M, BAS S, HARMANDAR E., Response of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Suspension Bridge under spatially varying multi-point earthquake excitations, Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 84, pp. 44-54, (2016)
  • [5] YAN Jukao, LI Jianzhong, PENG Tianbo, Et al., Effect of wave passage on seismic response of multi-tower suspension bridge under different longitudinal constraint systems, Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 38, 6, pp. 874-880, (2017)
  • [6] WANG Hao, TAO Tianyou, ZHANG Yuping, Et al., Seismic control of long-span triple-tower suspension bridge under travelling wave action, Journal of Southeast University (natural science edition), 47, 2, pp. 343-349, (2017)
  • [7] LIU Xiaolu, SU Cheng, LI Baomu, Et al., Random vibration analysis of long-span bridges under non-uniform seismic excitations by explicit time-domain method, China civil engineering journal, 52, 3, pp. 50-60, (2019)
  • [8] ETTOUNEY M, HAPIJ A, GAJER R., Frequency-domain analysis of long-span bridges subjected to nonuniform seismic motions, Journal of bridge engineering, 6, 6, pp. 577-586, (2001)
  • [9] DUMANOGLU A A, BROWNJOHN J M W, SEVERN R T., Seismic analysis of the fatih sultan mehmet (second bosporus) suspension bridge, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 21, 10, pp. 881-906, (1992)
  • [10] JIAO Changke, LI Aiqun, CAO Lilin, Et al., Traveling wave influence analysis for triple-tower suspension bridges, China civil engineering journal, 43, 12, pp. 100-106, (2010)