Effects of different combined pretreatments on biogenic methane production by anaerobic digestion of lignite

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhang H. [1 ]
Yao Y. [1 ,2 ]
Xie C. [3 ]
机构：
[1] College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
[2] Northwest Research Center of Rural Renewable Energy Exploitation and Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling
[3] China North Industries Group Corporation Limited, Xiangtan
来源：
Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration | 2021年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词：
anaerobic fermentation; biogenic methane; carbohydrate content; joint pretreatment; lignite; volatile fatty acids;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.04.019
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
It is crucial to choose efficient and practical pretreatment for increasing methane production. However, the treatment effect is often unsatisfactory through a single pretreatment method. In particular, it has an uncertain influence on the methane production of lignite with complex composition. In order to explore the effect of fermenting methane from lignite through the different joint pretreatment, with 1.00% HCl + 5.00% H2O2(group 1), 6.00% NaOH + 5.00% H2O2(group 2), 1.00% HCl + 10.00 g(group 3), 6.00% NaOH + 10.00 g(group 4), and 5.00% H2O2 + 10.00 g ligninase(group 5) as the experimental groups, and with the unpretreated coal samples (group 6) as the control group, the experiments of methane production through anaerobic fermentation were carried out under suitable strain sources and environmental conditions. The colorimetry, the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and the scanning election microscopy were used to analyze the saccharide, the volatile fatty acid content and the degradation characteristics n the process of joint pretreatment of methane so as to reveal its influence mechanism. The results showed the following: (1) Different joint pretreatment increased methane yield similarly. The treatment of groups 4 and 5 with the cumulative methane production up to 20.36 mL/g and 8.83 mL/g respectively, proved to be more effective for the degradation of coal. Compared with the group 6, the methane production of the two groups has increased by 24.24 and 10.51 times respectively. (2) The COD removal rate of each experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the pH variation was also relatively small. (3) At the beginning of the reaction, the lowest polysaccharide content belonged to group 3(0.37 μg/mL), whereas the highest number fell into group 6(2.15 μg/mL). The polysaccharide content of the two groups showed the same variation tendency(first decreasing and then increasing). (4) The reducing sugar contents of experimental groups 2, 3, and 5 remained at relatively high level on the whole. At the end of the reaction, the carbohydrate content of each gas-producing group was not zero. (5) All the joint pretreatments promoted the degradation of acetate and butyrate, and improved the carbon conversion rate. This research demonstrated the effectiveness of enhancing biogenic methane from coal through the joint pretreatment. It is hoped that the methods and the findings of this study may shed light on the industrialization applications of biogas production from coal. © 2021 Science Press. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：162 / 169
页数：7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] WANG Aikuan, SHAO Pei, LAN Fengjuan, Et al., Organic chemicals in coal available to microbes to produce biogenic coalbed methane: A review of current knowledge[J], Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 60, pp. 40-48, (2018)
  • [2] MAYUMI D, MOCHIMARU H, TAMAKI H, Et al., Methane production from coal by a single methanogen[J], Science, 354, 6309, pp. 222-225, (2016)
  • [3] ROBBINS S J, EVANS P N, ESTERLE J S, Et al., The effect of coal rank on biogenic methane potential and microbial composition[J], International Journal of Coal Geology, pp. 205-212, (2016)
  • [4] WANG Shanshan, HAN Yaxin, HE Huan, Et al., Isolation and phylogenic analysis of a methanogen from coal bed water[J], Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 20, 1, pp. 123-127, (2014)
  • [5] PARK S Y, LIANG Yanna, Biogenic methane production from coal : A review on recent research and development on microbially enhanced coalbed methane(MECBM)[J], Fuel, 166, pp. 258-267, (2016)
  • [6] XIA Daping, HUANG Song, ZHANG Huaiwen, Transformation analysis of key liquid phase products during lignite fermentation to produce biological hydrogen[J], Nature Gas Industry, 39, 8, pp. 146-153, (2019)
  • [7] HARRIS S H, SMITH R L, BARKER C E., Microbial and chemical factors influencing methane production in laboratory incubations of low-rank subsurface coals[J], International Journal of Coal Geology, 76, pp. 46-51, (2008)
  • [8] HUANG Zaixing, URYNOWICZ M A, COLBERG P J S., Stimulation of biogenic methane generation in coal samples following chemical treatment with potassium permanganate[J], Fuel, 111, pp. 813-819, (2013)
  • [9] HUANG Zaixing, URYNOWICZ M A, COLBERG P J S., Bioassay of chemically treated subbituminous coal derivatives using Pseudomonas putida F1[J], International Journal of Coal Geology, 115, pp. 97-105, (2013)
  • [10] GUO Hongyu, LIU Xile, BAI Yang, Et al., Impact of coal particle size on biogenic methane metabolism and its significance[J], Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13, 2, pp. 1297-1301, (2016)
1234