Reprint of: Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Can [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Hao [2 ]
Zhu, Wenqing [4 ]
机构
[1] Economics and Management College, Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University of China, 712100, China
[2] China National Forestry Economics and Development Research Center, Beijing,100714, China
[3] Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Center, P.O. Box 4000, 1350 Regent Street, Fredericton,NB,E3B 5P7, Canada
[4] Economics and Management College, China Agricultural University, No. 17 Qinghua East Road, Beijing,100081, China
关键词
Commerce - Natural resources - Method of moments - Timber - Investments;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Both the reform of forestland tenure and timber market liberalization are important for forest resources management worldwide. This paper employs a unique provincial level panel dataset of 8 National Forest Resource Inventories and related price and investment data to estimate the effects on the forest of China's reforms of collective forestland tenure and timber prices in the 1980s. The system Generalized Method of Moments with robustness (controlling for endogeneity) and fixed effects models were used to identify the determinants of these reforms for the collective forest region of southern China. Our empirical results indicate that these two reforms jointly caused deforestation and forest degradation. As much as 13.5% of the total forest area was lost, and 14.9% of the forest volume was removed. Deforestation in the 1980s was followed with widespread negative long-term impacts on forest growth and afforested area. These policy failures suggest the important lesson that a well-conceived framework for monitoring and regulation needs to be in place for successfully implemented reforms. © 2017
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 18
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?
    Liu, Can
    Wang, Sen
    Liu, Hao
    Zhu, Wenqing
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 83 : 131 - 141
  • [2] Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail? (Reprinted from Forest Policy and Economics, vol 83, pg 131-141, 2017)
    Liu, Can
    Wang, Sen
    Liu, Hao
    Zhu, Wenqing
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 98 : 8 - 18
  • [3] Effects of China's Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Policies on Forest Product Firm Values
    Zhang, Tingting
    Yao, Shunbo
    Yu, Jinna
    Abu Hatab, Assem
    Liu, Zhen
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [4] Has China's New Round of Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Caused an Increase in Rural Labor Transfer?
    Yang, Liu
    Ren, Yang
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (09)
  • [5] Decentralizing while centralizing: An explanation of China's collective reform since the 1980s
    Xu, Tuoyuan
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    Agrawal, Arun
    Liu, Jinlong
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 119
  • [6] WHY DID MALE PENSION COVERAGE DECLINE IN THE 1980S
    EVEN, WE
    MACPHERSON, DA
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1994, 47 (03): : 439 - 453
  • [7] The effect of collective forestland tenure reform in China: Does land parcelization reduce forest management intensity?
    Xie, Yi
    Gong, Peichen
    Han, Xiao
    Wen, Yali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2014, 20 (02) : 126 - 140
  • [8] China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform and the Future of the Giant Panda
    Yang, Biao
    Busch, Jonah
    Zhang, Li
    Ran, Jianghong
    Gu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Wen
    Du, Beibei
    Xu, Yu
    Mittermeier, Russell A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2015, 8 (04): : 251 - 261
  • [9] A welfare measurement of China's rural forestry reform during the 1980s
    Yin, RS
    Xu, JT
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 30 (10) : 1755 - 1767
  • [10] Domestic and foreign consequences of China's land tenure reform on collective forests
    Zhang, H.
    Buongiorno, J.
    Zhu, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2012, 14 (03) : 349 - 362