A hight-accuracy method for tropospheric zenith delay error correction by fusing atmospheric numerical models

被引：0
|
作者：
Mao J. [1 ,2 ]
Cui T. [1 ,2 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Chen L. [1 ]
Sun Y. [1 ]
Gao S. [1 ]
Zhang H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin
[2] Tianjin Engineering Center for Geospatial Information Technology, Tianjin
来源：
Cehui Xuebao/Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica | 2019年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词：
Atmospheric numerical model; High spatiotemporal resolution; High-precision; Tropospheric zenith delay;
D O I：
10.11947/j.AGCS.2019.20190003
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The complexity and intensity of water vapor variations are the fundamental reasons why it is difficult for tropospheric zenith delay models to get accurate estimation. To solve this problem, a new method for estimating tropospheric zenith delay based on WRF(weather research and forecasting model) atmospheric numerical model is proposed. By analyzing the numerical simulation mechanism and data structure characteristics of WRF model, a hybrid method of direct integration and correction model is used to estimate the hourly tropospheric zenith delay at any position in the world. The validation results show that the accuracy of the hourly ZTD reanalysis value calculated by this method is 13.6 mm, and the daily average value is 9.3 mm, which is about 5 times and 3.5 times higher than that of the traditional model UNB3m and the current model GPT2w, respectively. In the 30-hour forecast period, the accuracy of the forecast value can also reach 22 mm. The accuracy is higher than existing tropospheric zenith delay models whether for the ZTD reanalysis value or the forecast value. © 2019, Surveying and Mapping Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：862 / 870
页数：8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Hopfield H.S., Two-quartic tropospheric refractivity profile for correcting satellite data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, 18, pp. 4487-4499, (1969)
  • [2] Saastamoinen J., Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites, The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, pp. 247-251, (1972)
  • [3] Leandro R.F., Santos M.C., Langley R.B., UNB neutral atmosphere models: development and performance, Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, pp. 564-573, (2006)
  • [4] Penna N., Dodson A., Wu C., Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model, The Journal of Navigation, 54, 1, pp. 37-55, (2001)
  • [5] Krueger E., Schuler T., Arbesser-Rastburg B., The standard tropospheric correction model for the European satellite navigation system Galileo, Proceedings of the XXVIIIth General Assembly of the International Union of Radio Science, (2005)
  • [6] Schuler T., The TropGrid2 standard tropospheric correction model, GPS Solutions, 18, 1, pp. 123-131, (2014)
  • [7] Boehm J., Heinkelmann R., Schuh H., Short Note: a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications, Journal of Geodesy, 81, 10, pp. 679-683, (2007)
  • [8] Lagler K., Schindelegger M., Bohm J., Et al., GPT2: empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques, Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 6, pp. 1069-1073, (2013)
  • [9] Bohm J., Moller G., Schindelegger M., Et al., Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w), GPS Solutions, 19, 3, pp. 433-441, (2015)
  • [10] Yao Y., Zhang S., Kong J., Research progress and prospect of GNSS space environment science, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 46, 10, pp. 1408-1420, (2017)
123