Safety differences of LiFePO4 batteries at the beginning of life and end of life

被引:0
|
作者
Liu B. [1 ,2 ]
Wang J. [2 ]
Zeng T. [2 ]
Yin Y. [1 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, Beijing
[2] Research and Development Center, Tianjin Lishen Cell Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., Tianjin
来源
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal | 2022年 / 73卷 / 12期
关键词
beginning of life; end of life; lithium iron phosphate; power battery; safety;
D O I
10.11949/0438-1157.20221339
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Compared with fresh batteries, the safety research of lithium-ion batteries in the whole life cycle is more worthy of attention. The large-size prismatic aluminum-shell lithium iron phosphate power batteries in two states, i.e., beginning of life (BOL) and end of life (EOL) were selected as the research objects. The specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, material's thermal stability and direct current internal resistance of BOL and EOL batteries were analyzed firstly. The safety differences of BOL and EOL batteries were compared in detail, such as overdischarge, over-charge, external short-circuit, heating, nail penetration, and crush, etc. The results show that compared to BOL battery, the specific heat capacity of the EOL battery decreases from 1.088 J/(g·℃) to 1.065 J/(g·℃). The thermal conductivity in the height, width, and thickness directions of the battery decreased from 25.84, 21.21, 1.05 W/(m·K) to 22.20, 18.44, 1.00 W/(m·K). The exothermic peaks shifted to low temperature, and the exothermic peak of solid electrolyte interface film decomposition appeared near 121℃, and the exothermic enthalpy of the reaction between the intercalated lithium-graphite compounds, electrolyte, and binder decreased from 1019 J/g to 841 J/g. In terms of safety, the EOL battery after over-discharge generated more gas, leading to a larger thickness swelling. Over-charge produced more gas with EOL battery, and the vent opened ahead of 7% state of charge. The external short-circuit current cannot fuse the connecting structure, and the battery would discharge continually to over-discharge state, giving more gas production and serious swelling. The nail penetration did not release smoke, the vent was not broke, and the safety was greatly improved. The temperature of thermal runaway caused by heating was close, and the differences of other safety test items were little. The research results enriched the research on the safety performance of lithium-ion batteries in the whole life cycle, and contributed to the thermal runaway protection design of batteries, modules and systems. © 2022 Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5555 / 5563
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Cai W L, Yan C, Yao Y X, Et al., The boundary of lithium plating in graphite electrode for safe lithium-ion batteries, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 60, 23, pp. 13007-13012, (2021)
  • [2] Cai Z H, Mendoza S, Goodman J, Et al., The influence of cycling, temperature, and electrode gapping on the safety of prismatic lithium-ion batteries, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 167, 16, (2020)
  • [3] Chen X X, Yan S S, Tan T H, Et al., Supramolecular“flameretardant”electrolyte enables safe and stable cycling of lithium-ion batteries, Energy Storage Materials, 45, pp. 182-190, (2022)
  • [4] Liang C, Jiang L H, Ye S L, Et al., Comprehensive analysis on dynamic heat generation of LiNi<sub>1/3</sub>Co<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> coin cell under overcharge, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 166, 14, pp. A3369-A3376, (2019)
  • [5] Liao Z H, Zhang S, Li K, Et al., Hazard analysis of thermally abused lithium-ion batteries at different state of charges, Journal of Energy Storage, 27, (2020)
  • [6] Ren D S, Hsu H, Li R H, Et al., A comparative investigation of aging effects on thermal runaway behavior of lithium-ion batteries, eTransportation, 2, (2019)
  • [7] Hou J X, Feng X N, Wang L, Et al., Unlocking the self-supported thermal runaway of high-energy lithium-ion batteries, Energy Storage Materials, 39, pp. 395-402, (2021)
  • [8] Song Y Z, Liu X, Ren D S, Et al., Simultaneously blocking chemical crosstalk and internal short circuit via gel-stretching derived nanoporous non-shrinkage separator for safe lithium-ion batteries, Advanced Materials, 34, 2, (2022)
  • [9] Huang Z, Qin P, Shi H, Et al., Study on thermal runaway behavior of 86 Ah lithium iron phosphate battery under overheat condition, High Voltage Engineering, 48, 3, pp. 1185-1191, (2022)
  • [10] Mao B B, Liu C Q, Yang K, Et al., Thermal runaway and fire behaviors of a 300 Ah lithium ion battery with LiFePO<sub>4</sub> as cathode, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139, (2021)