The method and experiments of redefined model-free adaptive heading control of unmanned surface vehicle

被引:0
|
作者
Liao Y. [1 ]
Du T. [1 ]
Fu Y. [1 ]
Jiang Q. [1 ]
Chen Q. [1 ]
Jiang W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
关键词
Adaptive control; Heading control; Model-free adaptive control(MFAC); Pseudo partial derivative; Redefined output; Uncertain influence; Unmanned surface vehicle;
D O I
10.11990/jheu.201808090
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To solve the heading control problem of unmanned surface vehicle (USV) with uncertain influence, an improved model-free adaptive control method (MFAC) is proposed in this paper. First, the compact form dynamic linearization MFAC (CFDL-MFAC) method and its inherent failure problem in USV heading control applications were analyzed. Then, aiming at the special dynamic characteristics of USV heading control subsystem, the redefinition output MFAC method was developed by introducing the redefinition output gain. Theoretical analysis shows that this method can make the heading control subsystem satisfy the quasi-linear assumption of MFAC theory. Finally, the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method are verified through the simulation studies and field experiments of the Dolphin-Ⅱ small USV. © 2020, Editorial Department of Journal of HEU. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Manley J.E., Unmanned surface vehicles, 15 years of development, Proceedings of the OCEANS 2008, pp. 1-4, (2008)
  • [2] Breivik M., Hovstein V.E., Fossen T.I., Straight-line target tracking for unmanned surface vehicles, Modeling, Identification and Control, 29, 4, pp. 131-149, (2008)
  • [3] Liao Y., Zhang M., Wan L., Et al., Trajectory tracking control for underactuated unmanned surface vehicles with dynamic uncertainties, Journal of Central South University, 23, 2, pp. 370-378, (2016)
  • [4] Hu Z., Zhou H., Lin Y., Et al., The course control based on an on-line self-adjusted PID control algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles, Robot, 35, 3, (2013)
  • [5] Kumar V., Nakra B.C., Mittal A.P., A review on classical and fuzzy PID controllers, International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, 16, 3, pp. 170-181, (2011)
  • [6] Zhou H., Feng X., Hu Z., Et al., Dynamic feedback controller based on optimized switching of multiple identification models for course control of unmanned surface vehicle, Robot, 35, 5, pp. 552-558, (2013)
  • [7] Naeem W., Xu T., Sutton R., Et al., The design of a navigation, guidance, and control system for an unmanned surface vehicle for environmental monitoring, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 222, 2, pp. 67-79, (2008)
  • [8] Sharma S.K., Naeem W., Sutton R., An autopilot based on a local control network design for an unmanned surface vehicle, The Journal of Navigation, 65, 2, pp. 281-301, (2012)
  • [9] Sonnenburg C.R., Woolsey C.A., Modeling, identification, and control of an unmanned surface vehicle, Journal of Field Robotics, 30, 3, pp. 371-398, (2013)
  • [10] Hu S.S., Juang J.Y., Robust nonlinear ship course-keeping control under the influence of high wind and large wave disturbances, Proceedings of the 8th Asian Control Conference, pp. 393-398, (2011)