Removing mixed noise from remote sensing images by wavelet multifractal method

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng L. [1 ]
Li A. [1 ]
Jia X. [1 ]
Li Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mathematics and Statistics, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun
关键词
image processing; multifractal; remote sensing image denoising; semi-soft threshold; wavelet analysis;
D O I
10.37188/OPE.20223015.1880
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To remove the mixed noise from remote sensing images, a wavelet multifractal denoising algorithm was developed. The algorithm mainly uses wavelet analysis for signal decomposition and multifractal to extract image features. First, image decomposition was performed by wavelet decomposition, and additive noise was preliminarily processed using the exponential decay threshold method of the wavelet semi-soft threshold. Second, using the multifractal theory, the multifractal spectrum of the noisy image was found, and an offset operator is constructed to process the additive noise twice. Then, the sparse gradient set was obtained by multiplying the direction gradient with the two-dimensional mask layer pixel by pixel, and the denoised image is reconstructed. Finally, the evaluation index value of the denoised image was calculated, and the denoising effect was evaluated according to the numerical analysis. The experimental results show that the method can effectively remove the mixed noise of remote sensing images. The maximum peak signal-to-noise ratio of the denoised images is 26. 700 dB by denoising six randomly added noise images. Moreover, the highest edge preservation index is 0. 449. It can meet the requirements of the visibility and detail preservation of mixed denoising of remote sensing images and provide a reliable basis for subsequent analysis. © 2022 Chinese Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1880 / 1888
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] QUILTY J, ADAMOWSKI J., A stochastic wavelet-based data-driven framework for forecasting uncertain multiscale hydrological and water resources processes[J], Environmental Modelling & Software, 130, (2020)
  • [2] CHEN Y T, LI Y Y, LU SH L, Et al., Research on oil spill monitoring of multi-source remote sensing image based on deep semantic segmentation[J], Opt. Precision Eng, 28, 5, pp. 1165-1176, (2020)
  • [3] ZHANG J., Wavelet analysis on effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources[J], Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17, 4, pp. 9411-9423, (2019)
  • [4] LUZARDI A C M, CARDENAS C., Recent dynamical features of Tyndall and grey glaciers, from southern Patagonian icefield, by using satellite remote sensing techniques[J], 2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference(LAGIRS), pp. 284-289, (2020)
  • [5] PELELI S, KOULI M, MARCHESE F, Et al., Monitoring temporal variations in the geothermal activity of Miocene Lesvos volcanic field using remote sensing techniques and MODIS - LST imagery[J], International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 95, (2021)
  • [6] JOYCE K E, BELLISS S E, SAMSONOV S V, Et al., A review of the status of satellite remote sensing and image processing techniques for mapping natural hazards and disasters[J], Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 33, 2, pp. 183-207, (2009)
  • [7] ZHAO X, PAN S, SUN Z, Et al., Advances of satellite remote sensing technology in earthquake prediction[J], Natural Hazards Review, 20, 1, (2021)
  • [8] WANG C, RUIFEI Z, BAI Y, Et al., Single-frame super-resolution for high resolution optical remote-sensing data products[J], International Journal of Remote Sensing, 42, 21, pp. 8099-8123, (2021)
  • [9] PAN X, ZHANG C, XU J, Et al., Simplified object-based deep neural network for very high resolution remote sensing image classification[J], ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 181, pp. 218-237, (2021)
  • [10] LI X X, NIU SH G., Design of highly regular 2D wavelet and its application in remote sensing image denoising[J], Journal of Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, 20, 2, pp. 48-51, (2008)