Profitability, income inequality, and subjective well-being of mariculture households in China

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Jing [1 ]
Yang, Hongbo [2 ]
Yang, Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Center for Intelligent Ecology and Sustainability, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Rd., Hangzhou,310058, China
[2] Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, 53 Bay State Rd., MA,02215, United States
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Marine biology - Aquaculture - Surveys;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mariculture has a profound potential to sustainably meet the escalating demands for food and livelihoods. However, the socioeconomic impacts of small-scale aquaculture (SSA) are poorly understood, particularly for marine SSA in China, a leading global producer of aquaculture products. Using detailed household surveys, we comprehensively evaluated profitability, income inequality, and subjective well-being of marine SSA households in a representative coastal city in Southeastern China. Our results show that mariculture practices increased income but exacerbated income inequality in animal mariculture households (AMHs) and seaweed mariculture households (SMHs). Earnings from AMHs (544 549 yuan) were four times higher than those of SMHs (141 172 yuan) although AMHs were twice as likely to make a loss (27.4% versus 12.5%). Natural capital (11.37%) and the cultured variety (12.40%) were the main contributors to mariculture income inequality for AMHs, while manufactured capital (27.59%) and previous mariculture experience (8.59%) were significant for SMHs. The well-being of AMHs was better than that of SMHs. Our results suggest that secure access to sea areas, provision of financial options to mariculture smallholders, as well as diversification in mariculture type and variety could promote the socioeconomic sustainability of mariculture development. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Profitability, income inequality, and subjective well-being of mariculture households in China
    Wu, Jing
    Yang, Hongbo
    Yang, Wu
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [2] The Impact of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of China
    Jiawen Ding
    Javier Salinas-Jiménez
    Maria del Mar Salinas-Jiménez
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, 22 : 845 - 866
  • [3] The Impact of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of China
    Ding, Jiawen
    Salinas-Jimenez, Javier
    del Mar Salinas-Jimenez, Maria
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2021, 22 (02) : 845 - 866
  • [4] Income inequality, corruption and subjective well-being
    Yan, Bing
    Wen, Bo
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (12) : 1311 - 1326
  • [5] Reduction of Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being in Europe
    Hajdu, Tamas
    Hajdu, Gabor
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2014, 8
  • [6] Income inequality, economic growth, and subjective well-being: Evidence from China
    Wu, Xiaogang
    Li, Jun
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2017, 52 : 49 - 58
  • [7] Income Inequality, Neighbourhood Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being in China: Exploration of a Moderating Effect
    Huang, Jiawen
    Fang, Yitong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (13)
  • [8] The Impact of Different Levels of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being in China: A Panel Data Analysis
    Komatsu, Sho
    Suzuki, Aya
    CHINESE ECONOMY, 2023, 56 (02) : 104 - 123
  • [9] Favorite Possessions Protect Subjective Well-Being Under Income Inequality
    Liu, Jingshi
    Dalton, Amy N.
    Mukhopadhyay, Anirban
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2024, 61 (04) : 700 - 717
  • [10] Affluence and Subjective Well-Being: Does Income Inequality Moderate their Associations?
    Weiting Ng
    Ed Diener
    Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2019, 14 : 155 - 170