Sensitivity analysis of radar system effectiveness based on FAST and Sobol index method

被引：1
|
作者：
Hu T. [1 ]
Shen L. [1 ]
Zhu J. [1 ]
Sun C. [1 ]
Dong W. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Instrumentation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin
来源：
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2024年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词：
effectiveness evaluation; Fourier amplitudes sensitivity test (FAST); radar system; sensitivity analysis; Sobol index method;
D O I：
10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.02.20
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to rapidly improve the comprehensive efficiency of the air detection radar system at a low cost, the evaluation index system of the comprehensive efficiency is firstly establised, and then the establishment of the comprehensive effectiveness evaluation model is completed. Two global sensitivity analysis methods, including Fourier amplitudes sensitivity test (FAST) and Sobol index method based on variance principle, are selected to conduct sensitivity analysis on the established evaluation model from the perspectives of frequency domain and time domain respectively. In the sensitivity analysis based on FAST, the method of selecting the eigenfrequency set corresponding to the 21-dimensional input index is proposed. In the sensitivity analysis based on Sobol index method, the effects of the second-order and higher-order sensitivity indexes are considered. By comparing the analysis results of FAST and Sobol index method, it can be seen that the sensitivity analysis results obtained by the two methods have good consistency. Among them, power and frequency are the main influence indicators of the air detection radar, which can provide the reliability basis for the development and upgrade of the radar system. © 2024 Chinese Institute of Electronics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：561 / 569
页数：8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] HAN W, TANG Z Y, ZHU Z B., Method of target tracking with Doppler blind zone constraint, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 24, 6, pp. 889-898, (2013)
  • [2] ACCARDO D, FASANO G, FORLENZA L, Et al., Flight test of a radar-based tracking system for UAS sense and avoid, IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 49, 2, pp. 1139-1160, (2013)
  • [3] WANG G E, LI X M, LI C S., Comprehensive radar counter-measure reconnaissance effectiveness analysis of the warship and aircraft on sea, Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 31, 6, pp. 69-75, (2016)
  • [4] TENG J, GUO W H, GUI C., Analysis of the phased array radar's integrated information support effectiveness in air defense[j], Ship Electronic Engineering, 31, 8, pp. 63-66, (2011)
  • [5] HU G T, LI X, WANG W L, Et al., Assessment of intelligence support effectiveness of close-in radar for surface-to-air missile system, Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 20, 1, pp. 5-7, (2006)
  • [6] SALTELLI A., Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices, Computer Physics Communications, 145, 2, pp. 280-297, (2002)
  • [7] BORGONOVO E, PECCATI L., Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the evaluation of investment projects, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 1, pp. 62-73, (2005)
  • [8] SONG X M, KONG F Z, ZHAN C S, Et al., Parameter identification and global sensitivity analysis of Xin'anjiang model using meta-modeling approach, Water Science and Engineering, 6, 1, pp. 1-17, (2013)
  • [9] FREY H C, PATIL S R., Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods, Risk Analysis, 22, 3, pp. 553-578, (2002)
  • [10] MASSMANN C, HOLZMANN H., Analysis of the behavior of a rainfall-runoff model using three global sensitivity analysis methods evaluated at different temporal scales, Journal of Hydrology, 475, pp. 97-110, (2012)
1234