STRATEGIC AND GEODYNAMIC ANALYSES OF GEO-SEQUESTRATION OF CO2 IN CHINA OFFSHORE SEDIMENTARY BASINS

被引:0
|
作者
Li C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao X. [1 ]
Duan W. [4 ]
Wu T. [1 ,2 ]
Yao Z. [5 ]
Chen G. [1 ]
Li G. [1 ,2 ]
Peng X. [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Marine Sciences, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, Zhoushan
[2] Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Hainan, Sanya
[3] Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Shandong, Qingdao
[4] Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, MOE, Ocean University of China, Shandong, Qingdao
[5] College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou
[6] College of Marine Science and Technology, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhejiang, Zhoushan
关键词
basalt mineralization; basin analysis; carbonate veins; China Sea basin; geological carbon sequestration; hydrostatic pressure;
D O I
10.6052/0459-1879-22-384
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Focusing on the national strategic goal of "Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality", this paper comprehensively analyzes the strategic conditions and targets suitable for large-scale CO2 geo-storage in the China offshore basins, from the perspectives of fault activity, basin pressure, tectonic subsidence, seismicity, and geothermal gradient. It is considered that the East China Sea Shelf Basin, Pearl River Mouth Basin, eastern Qiongdongnan Basin, and the central South China Sea basin are the best geological storage areas for CO2, although this does not exclude suitable targets in other unfavorable sedimentary basins since a specific geo-sequestration target is small in area. The suitable CO2 storage strata in the East China Sea Shelf, Pearl River Mouth, and Qiongdongnan Basins include the bottom salt-water layer of the late rapid subsidence sediments in the open-sea environment and the hydrocarbon-bearing units in the thermal subsidence sedimentary sequences. Between 800 and 4000 m depths beneath the seafloor, the porosity is greater than 10%, and the hydrostatic and lithostatic pressures vary from ~ 8 to ~ 40 MPa and from ~ 13 to ~ 83 MPa, respectively. In this pressure and suitable geothermal gradient ranges, CO2 exists in a supercritical state, and its density is relatively stable with temperature and pressure changes, which is beneficial to the flow and permeation of CO2. The scale and number of mafic magmatic rock formations in the basins also provide good conditions for CO2 geological sequestration and permanent mineralization. Although operationally difficult and expensive, CO2 storage in the central South China Sea basin is very safe. CO2 injected deep into the oceanic basalt can undergo basalt mineralization, but if CO2 is escaped as the mineralization process is relatively slow, escaped CO2 can be further trapped by multiple other storage processes, including pyroclastic rock mineralization, seafloor sediment sequestration, seabed sediment CO2 hydrate storage, carbonate neutralization reaction, seabed carbon lake, ocean dissolution, etc. The existing six International Oceanic Discovery Program (IODP) boreholes that have encountered basement basalt in the central basin of the South China Sea can provide a good scientific and engineering foundation for the pilot CO2 storage experiment in the South China Sea basin. © 2023 Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 731
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Wen Dongguang, Guo Jianqiang, Zhang Senqi, The progress in the research on carbon dioxide geological storage in China, Geology in China, 41, 5, pp. 1716-1723, (2014)
  • [2] Wang Jianghai, Sun Xianxian, Xu Xiaoming, Et al., Marine carbon sequestration: current situation, problems and future, Advances in Earth Science, 30, 1, pp. 17-25, (2015)
  • [3] Li Qi, Wei Yani, Liu Guizhen, Assessment of CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity and saline water development in sedimentary basins of China, South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 11, 4, pp. 93-96, (2013)
  • [4] Sun Tengmin, Liu Shiqi, Wang Tao, Research advances on evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage potential in China, Coal Science and Technology, 49, 11, pp. 10-20, (2021)
  • [5] Ye Jianping, Zhang Bing, Han Xueting, Et al., Well group carbon dioxide injection for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and key parameter of the numerical simulation and application in deep coalbed methane, Journal of China Coal Society, 41, 1, pp. 149-155, (2016)
  • [6] Zheng Yan, Chen Shengli, Zhang Wei, Et al., Numerical simulation on geological storage of carbon dioxide in Jiangling Depression, Jianghan Basin, China, Geological Science and Technology Information, 28, 4, pp. 75-82, (2009)
  • [7] Cui Zhendong, Liu Da'an, Zeng Rongshu, Et al., Fracture resistance analysis on the cap rock of the sand lens reservoir due to carbon dioxide injection and storage, Journal of Engineering Geology, 18, 2, pp. 204-210, (2009)
  • [8] Schrag DP., Storage of carbon dioxide in offshore sediments, Science, 325, 5948, pp. 1658-1659, (2009)
  • [9] Haszeldine RS., Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be ?, Science, 325, pp. 1647-1652, (2009)
  • [10] Li Wenping, Basic theory and present situation analysis of carbon dioxide geological, Henan Science and Technology, 10, pp. 141-143, (2021)