A framework for evaluating enhancement quality as part of the EIA process

被引:0
|
作者
Nisbet J. [1 ]
João E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arup, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow
[2] Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
关键词
Biodiversity; Deliberate benefits; EIA best practice; Enhancement; Environmental impact assessment; Mitigation; Monitoring; Net-gain;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106806
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a framework for evaluating the quality of enhancement of positive impacts in Environmental Impact Assessment reports (EIARs). The ‘Enhancement Quality Testing Framework’ created for this study is structured around four performance indicators to evaluate enhancement measures detailed in EIARs that focus on: Inclusion; Timing; Thoroughness; and Responsibility & Monitoring. In this way a holistic view of enhancement has been taken to create a framework to evaluate enhancement quality. The framework was tested in documentary research of 24 Scottish EIARs published between 2015 and 2020 (including relevant documents submitted as part of the planning application, such as Environmental Management Plans). The results highlighted a wide recognition of enhancement (70%) among the EIAR evaluated. However, the majority of grades assigned across the performance indicators for the reports examined fell within ‘Deficient’ or ‘Not Present’. The framework could be used and adapted by developers, consultants, decision makers and academics to provide insight, and to introduce accountability, regarding the quality of enhancement integration in EIA practice. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the quality of process models: Empirical testing of a quality framework
    Moody, DL
    Sindre, G
    Brasethvik, T
    Solvberg, A
    CONCEPTUAL MODELING - ER 2002, 2002, 2503 : 380 - 396
  • [2] Quality as relationship between structure, process, and outcome: A conceptual framework for evaluating quality
    Salzer, MS
    Nixon, C
    Schut, LJA
    Karver, MS
    Bickman, L
    SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH: EXPANDING THE RESEARCH BASE, ANNUAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 409 - 414
  • [3] Quality enhancement in OSS development process: a quantitative framework approach
    Jaswinder Singh
    Anu Gupta
    Preet Kanwal
    Singh, Jaswinder (jaswinder.davc@gmail.com), 2025, 33 (01)
  • [4] Enhancement of Process Stability and Part Quality for the Press Hardening of Sheet Metal
    Neugebauer, Reimund
    Goeschel, Angela
    Schieck, Frank
    Rautenstrauch, Anja
    Mosel, Andre
    Cai, Hangfeng
    HOT SHEET METAL FORMING OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE STEEL CHS2 (3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS), 2011, (03): : 229 - 236
  • [5] A model for evaluating the quality of the fixturing of the part from a machining process planning perspective
    D. Brissaud
    H. Paris
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1998, 14 : 172 - 179
  • [6] A model for evaluating the quality of the fixturing of the part from a machining process planning perspective
    Brissaud, D
    Paris, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 14 (03): : 172 - 179
  • [7] A Framework for Evaluating Business Process Performance
    Khlif, Wiem
    Kchaou, Mariem
    Gargouri, Faiez
    ICSOFT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 371 - 383
  • [8] A framework for evaluating technology management process
    Skilbeck, JN
    Cruickshank, CM
    INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 138 - 142
  • [9] Evaluating the implementation of a quality improvement process in General Practice using a realist evaluation framework
    Moule, Pam
    Clompus, Susan
    Fieldhouse, Jon
    Ellis-Jones, Julie
    Barker, Jacqueline
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (04) : 701 - 707
  • [10] A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process: a case study of Thailand
    Kantamaturapoj, Kanang
    Chanchitpricha, Chaunjit
    Hongsuwan, Parinee
    Suebsing, Pannipa
    Thaweesuk, Suwicha
    Wibulpolprasert, Suwit
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2023, 41 (06) : 444 - 462