Research on LOPA scenarios identification and screening based on simplified Bow-tie model

被引:0
|
作者
Liu M. [1 ]
Liu P. [2 ]
Wang H. [1 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Safety Science & Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao
[2] PipeChina Eastern Pipeline Company Zoucheng Oil Transportation Department, Zoucheng
来源
Wang, Haiqing (wanghaiqing@upc.edu.cn) | 2021年 / Materials China卷 / 40期
关键词
Bow-tie model; Model reduction; Petroleum; Safety; Scenarios screening;
D O I
10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2385
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scenarios screening is the key to ensure the effectiveness of layer of protection analysis (LOPA). To screen out the scenarios accurately which need to carry out the LOPA analysis, this paper proposes a scenarios identification and screening method based on the most credible scene on the basis of Bow-tie model. First, use the Fault tree and Event tree to establish a simplified Bow-tie model which centers on loss events to identify the potential hazards of the analysis object, and obtain a list of hazard scenarios. Secondly, improve the scenario screening method based on the most credible scenario identification method. Use the improved screening method to filter the list of hazardous scenarios. Simultaneously determine the scenarios that need carry on LOPA analysis in the scenarios list. Finally, apply this method in the 105m³ crude oil storage tank of a reserve storage and use risk analysis screening tool (RAST) to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can better consider the actual operation of the equipment and screen scenarios according to the internal risk standards of the enterprise, which makes the actual screening results obtained more instructive for the subsequent LOPA analysis. © 2021, Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5988 / 5997
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] BAYBUTT P., On the completeness of scenario identification in process hazard analysis (PHA), Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 55, pp. 492-499, (2018)
  • [2] HAUGE K H, BLANCHARD A, ANDERSEN G., Inadequate risk assessments-A study on worst-case scenarios related to petroleum exploitation in the Lofoten area, Marine Policy, 44, 2, pp. 82-89, (2014)
  • [3] DIAZ-OVALLE C, VAZQUEZ-ROMAN R, MANNAN M S., An approach to solve the facility layout problem based on the worst-case scenario, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23, 3, pp. 385-392, (2010)
  • [4] MEYSAMI H, EBADI T, ZOHDIRAD H, Et al., Worst-case identification of gas dispersion for gas detector mapping using dispersion modeling, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26, 6, pp. 1407-1414, (2013)
  • [5] SHARIFF A M, ZAINI D., Toxic release consequence analysis tool (TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 1, pp. 394-402, (2010)
  • [6] KHAN F I, ABBASI S A., A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15, 6, pp. 467-475, (2002)
  • [7] KHAN F I., Use maximum-credible accident scenarios for realistic reliable risk assessment, Chemical Engineering Progress, 97, 11, pp. 56-64, (2001)
  • [8] MARKOWSKI A S, SIUTA D., Selection of representative accident scenarios for major industrial accidents, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 111, pp. 652-662, (2017)
  • [9] NA Yongliang, WU Chongguang, XIA Yingchun, Et al., Classification of process hazard scenario and SDG qualitative identification method, CIESC Journal, 60, 10, pp. 2503-2508, (2009)
  • [10] ZHAO Guili, Selection and simulation study to the worst credible accident secenarios of refinery enterprise, (2016)