Performance analysis of information reconfiguration technology on civil aircraft

被引：0
|
作者：
Xu J. [1 ]
Wu L. [1 ]
Chu J. [1 ]
He K. [1 ]
机构：
[1] COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Shanghai
来源：
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica | 2019年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词：
Avionics system; Civil aircraft; Cockpit display system; Display management and information reconfiguration; Human-machine interface;
D O I：
10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22442
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Large-area display have been widely used in the cockpit of a new generation of civil aircraft. Although improving the information integration can improve the pilot's user experience, the high requirement of system integration is likely to cause the common mode failure of integrated display information in local failure. Since the information layout has an important influence on the performance of operation task management, if the increase of workload is induced, the flight crew may lose the necessary situational awareness in specific scenarios. Information reconfiguration technology is an important means to deal with such problems. Based on the management of crew resource in civil aircraft, the duty allocation of the flight crew, and the requirement of ergonomics, a 15 inch square-screen display on the main instrument panel is proposed as a layout scheme with comparative advantages. Starting from the flight crew operation task requirement under the critical scenario and based on the consistency of normal operation flow, compact format, reconfiguration function operation, and consistency of duty allocation, It proves that the display management strategy of this paper show a better information reconfiguration performance than the advanced reference aircraft through comparative analysis. At present, few articles have systematically analyzed and summarized this topic. © 2019, Press of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Crew resource management training: AC-121-FS-2011-41, (2011)
  • [2] Roger W.S., Dennis B.B., John L., Et al., Priorities, organization, and sources of information accessed by pilots in various phases of flight: DOT/FAA/AM-00/26, (2000)
  • [3] Paul C.S., Anna C.T., Flight crew task management in non-normal situations
  • [4] Loukia D.L., Key D., Immanuel B., Cockpit interruptions and distractions: A line observation study, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 1-6, (2001)
  • [5] Edwin H., The cognitive consequences of patterns of information flow, Intellectica, 30, pp. 53-74, (1999)
  • [6] Ken F., Rolf B., The agenda manager: A knowledge-based system to facilitate the management of flight deck activities, 1999 World Aviation Conference, pp. 922-936, (1999)
  • [7] Airworthiness standards for transport aircraft of CCAR part25: CCAR-25-R4, (2011)
  • [8] Airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes: FAR Part25, (2018)
  • [9] Certification specifications for large aeroplanes: CS-25, (2018)
  • [10] Committee S-7. Flight crew interface considerations in the flight deck design process for Part 25 aircraft: SAE ARP5056, (2006)
123