Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Two Different Geometric Error Modeling Methods for Machine Tools

被引：0
|
作者：
Dong Z. [1 ]
Li J. [2 ]
Liu X. [3 ,4 ]
Mei B. [3 ]
Chen J. [5 ]
机构：
[1] School of Automation Science and Electronical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing
[2] Chengdu Aircraft Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd, Chengdu
[3] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[4] Beijing Key Lab of Precision/Ultra-precision Manufacturing Equipment and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[5] Department of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Peking University, Beijing
来源：
Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering | 2019年 / 55卷 / 05期
关键词：
Effectiveness; Error compensation; Error model; Experimental verification; Geometric error modeling method; Machine tool;
D O I：
10.3901/JME.2019.05.137
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Machine tools are widely used in manufacturing whose geometric accuracy has important influences on the accuracy of workpieces. Error compensation of machine tool translation axis is an important method to achieve high geometrical accuracy for machine tools, in which geometric modeling lays the foundation. There are two error modeling methods are usually used, i.e., error modeling based on 18 and 21 error components respectively. Error compensation which consist of error measuring, error identification and error compensation is usually based on these two kinds of models. And the different effects of error compensations based on the two kinds of models have not been systematically studied. However, the differences would bring different influences, which are quite important for realizing better error compensation effects. Based on identification and compensation, two different geometric error models are systematically analyzed and compared by studying the simulation and experiment of the error measuring. Described by 18-error model, the 3-axis machine tool has 18 geometric errors, while described by 21-error model it has 18 geometric errors in which there are three extra angular errors resulting in the distortion of the error prediction model. Furthermore, the simulation and experiments results of error compensation also show that the error model with 18 geometric error components is better in error compensation. The study can bring a clear suggestion for the error compensation method by using software. © 2019 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码：137 / 147
页数：10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Li S., Dai Y., Yin Z., Accuracy Modeling Technology of Precision and Ultra-Precision Machine Tool, (2007)
  • [2] Cheng Q., Zhao H., Zhang G., Et al., An analytical approach for crucial geometric errors identification of multi-axis machine tool based on global sensitivity analysis, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75, 1-4, pp. 107-121, (2014)
  • [3] Su S., Study on the methods of precision modeling and error compensation for multi-axis CNC machine tools, (2002)
  • [4] Li J., Liu X., Xie F., Et al., The analysis of the research status of volumetric positioning accuracy improvement methods for five-axis NC machine tools, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53, 7, pp. 113-128, (2017)
  • [5] Srivastava A.K., Vrldhuis S.C., Elbestawit M.A., Modeling geometric and thermal errors in a five-axis CNC machine tool, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 35, 9, pp. 1321-1337, (1995)
  • [6] Zhu S.W., Ding G.F., Qin S.F., Et al., Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 54, pp. 24-29, (2012)
  • [7] Liu Y., Application of multibody dynamic in mechanical engineering, China Mechanical Engineering, 11, 2, pp. 144-149, (2000)
  • [8] Li J., Xie F., Liu X., Geometric error modeling and sensitivity analysis of a five-axis machine tool, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 82, 9, pp. 1-15, (2016)
  • [9] Test code for machine tools. Part 1. Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or finishing conditions, (1996)
  • [10] Test code for machine tools. Part 1. Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or finishing conditions, (1998)
12