Analysis of earth pressure on geogrid reinforced retaining wall and improvement of its calculation method

被引:0
|
作者
Li L. [1 ]
Zheng Z. [1 ]
Yan H. [1 ]
Huang S. [1 ]
Zhou X. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan
关键词
earth pressure; external friction angle; geogrid; numerical simulation; reinforced retaining wall;
D O I
10.1051/jnwpu/20224061366a
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The distribution law and calculation method of earth pressure have always been a difficult problem in the research of reinforced retaining wall. In this paper, the magnitude and distribution law of active earth pressure of reinforced earth retaining wall under different working conditions are explored by using the numerical simulation finite element method. Combined with the dynamic play of the internal and external friction angles, a calculation method of earth pressure under non-limit state is proposed, and it is compared with the traditional theoretical formula solutions, finite element numerical solutions and measured results to verify its rationality. The results show that the numerical value of the earth pressure of the retaining wall is affected by the stiffness and the number of layers of the geogrid, showing a general trend that the earth pressure gradually decreases with the increasing of number of the reinforcement layers and the stiffness. The earth pressure of the retaining wall is negatively correlated with the depth. The earth pressure of the reinforced earth retaining wall varies slightly with the depth under different working conditions, and the reinforcement effect is mainly reflected in the upper part of the retaining wall. The non-limit state calculation results obtained by using the improved empirical formula are consistent with the measured results, which proves that the improved formula is reasonable. ©2022 Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1374
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] CHOWDHURY S S., A study on lateral earth pressure against strutted retaining wall in cohesionless soil deposit, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 13, 2, pp. 122-138, (2017)
  • [2] AHMADABADI M, GHANBARI A., New procedure for active earth pressure calculation in retaining walls with reinforced cohesive-frictional backfill, Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 27, 6, pp. 456-463, (2009)
  • [3] VAHEDIFARD F, LESHCHINSKY B A, MORTEZAEI K, Et al., Active earth pressures for unsaturated retaining structures, Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 141, 11, (2015)
  • [4] YOO C, LEE D., Deep excavation-induced ground surface movement characteristic a numerical investigation, Computers & Geotechnics, 35, 2, pp. 231-252, (2008)
  • [5] HSIUNG B C B., A case study on the behaviour of a deep excavation in sand, Computers & Geotechnics, 36, 4, pp. 665-675, (2009)
  • [6] BILGIN O., Numerical studies of anchored sheet pile wall behavior constructed in cut and fill conditions, Computers & Geotechnics, 37, 3, pp. 399-407, (2010)
  • [7] LI L., Behavior of tire-geogrid-reinforced retaining wall system under dynamic vehicle load, International Journal of Geomechanics, 20, 4, (2020)
  • [8] WANG Yimin, YAN Cen, YU Heng, Et al., Experimental study on stress characteristics of geogrid reinforced widening embankment soil under static load, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 39, pp. 311-317, (2018)
  • [9] WANG Jiaquan, XU Liangjie, HUANG Shibin, Et al., Analysis of bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load, Rock and Soil Mechanics, 40, 11, pp. 4220-4228, (2019)
  • [10] SRBULOV M., Active earth pressure in cohesive soils with an inclined ground surface, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37, pp. 171-177, (2010)