Government support and the corporate innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Shi Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang T. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Applied Finance and Behavioral Sciences, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian
[2] School of Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian
[3] Research Center of Applied Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
corporate innovation; double difference method; government innovation support policy; policy effect;
D O I
10.12011/SETP2021-1920
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to thoroughly investigate the effects and internal mechanism of government innovation support policies, this paper takes the research and development subsidy policies and tax preferential policies proposed in the "National Medium and Long-term Science and Technology Development Plan Outline (2006-2020)" as the research object, adopts the double difference method based on propensity score matching identifies the double effects of government innovation support policies. The empirical results show that the government R&D subsidy policy has both the effects of "pre-incentive" and "post-reward", which significantly improves the innovation ability of corporate, while preferential tax policies cannot promote corporate innovation. Further analysis shows that continuous and stable R&D subsidies, geographical dispersion of business operations, and external innovation environment have significantly strengthened the positive effect of innovation support policies on corporate innovation. This article not only makes up for the existing research on the ignorance of the internal motivation and potential mechanism of government innovation support policies, but also extends the research perspective from "government hands" to "market hands", makes a necessary supplement to the logic chain of policy influence on corporate innovation capability. This paper reveals the internal law of the implementation of government innovation support policies, provides theoretical support and policy suggestions for government support to drive corporate innovation for our country to cope with increasingly fierce international competition and realize the innovation-driven development strategy. © 2022 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2002 / 2016
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Holmstrom B., Agency costs and innovation[J], The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 3, pp. 305-327, (1989)
  • [2] Francis B, Hasan I, Sharma Z., Incentives and innovation:Evidence from CEO compensation contracts, (2011)
  • [3] Lu R., Corporate innovation investment and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity[J], Accounting Research, 10, pp. 36-42, (2014)
  • [4] Li W G, Yu M G., Privatized enterprise's ownership structure and enterprise innovation[J], Management World, 4, pp. 112-125, (2015)
  • [5] Yuan J G, Hou Q S, Cheng C., The curse effect of corporate political resources:Based on the investigation of political connections and corporate technological innovation[J], Management World, 1, pp. 139-155, (2015)
  • [6] Shi X J, Wang A R., Impact of the specialty of corporate governance on innovation:Global evidence from the dual-class structure of internet firms[J], Economic Research Journal, 1, pp. 149-164, (2017)
  • [7] Nan J X, Zhang L, Zhang M J, Et al., Biform game for the cloud service supply chain with multi-person cooperation and technology innovation decision[J], Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 41, 8, pp. 1-16, (2021)
  • [8] Aghion P, Cai J, Dewatripont M, Et al., Industrial policy and competition, CEPR Discussion Papers, (2011)
  • [9] Meng Q B, Shi Q., The impact of macroeconomic policy uncertainty on enterprises'R&D:Theoretical analysis and empirical study[J], The Journal of World Economy, 9, pp. 75-98, (2017)
  • [10] Pan Y, Pan J P, Dai Y Y., Corporate litigation risk, judicial local protectionism and corporate innovation[J], Economic Research Journal, 3, pp. 131-145, (2015)